MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PERT, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by SNYDER, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by PERT, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by SNYDER, S. H.

Molecular Pharmacology, Vol 10, 868-879, Copyright © 1974 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Opiate Receptor Binding of Agonists and Antagonists Affected Differentially by Sodium

CANDACE B. PERT 1 and SOLOMON H. SNYDER 1

1 Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Department of Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205

Receptor binding of the tritiated opiate antagonists naloxone, nalorphine, and levallorphan is enhanced by sodium ion, while binding of the tritiated agonists oxymorphone, dihydromorphine, and levorphanol is diminished. This differential effect of Na+ is highly specific, since it is elicited by Na+ and Li+ but not by other monovalent or divalent cations. The relative effectiveness of nonradioactive opiates in inhibiting [3H]naloxone binding in the absence and presence of Na+ in vitro correlates impressively with their relative agonist-antagonist properties in vivo. It is hypothesized that sodium allosterically transforms opiate receptor sites from conformations which bind agonists more readily to conformations which bind antagonists more readily. This hypothesis is supported by the competition of opiate agonists and antagonists for receptor sites, the marked temperature dependence of binding, the similar extent of binding of tritiated agonists and antagonists at maximal saturation, the concurrent increase in naloxone binding sites and decrease in dihydromorphine binding sites caused by the addition of Na+, and the ability of Na+ to increase [3H]dihydromorphine dissociation with no effect on [3H]naloxone dissociation.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We gratefully acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Adele M. Snowman.

Submitted on August 12, 1974




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
L. Oliveira, C. M. Costa-Neto, C. R. Nakaie, S. Schreier, S. I. Shimuta, and A. C. M. Paiva
The Angiotensin II AT1 Receptor Structure-Activity Correlations in the Light of Rhodopsin Structure
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2007; 87(2): 565 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
K. A. Neve, M. G. Cumbay, K. R. Thompson, R. Yang, D. C. Buck, V. J. Watts, C. J. DuRand, and M. M. Teeter
Modeling and Mutational Analysis of a Putative Sodium-Binding Pocket on the Dopamine D2 Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2001; 60(2): 373 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
R. M. Quock, T. H. Burkey, E. Varga, Y. Hosohata, K. Hosohata, S. M. Cowell, C. A. Slate, F. J. Ehlert, W. R. Roeske, and H. I. Yamamura
The delta -Opioid Receptor: Molecular Pharmacology, Signal Transduction, and the Determination of Drug Efficacy
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 1999; 51(3): 503 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
E. H. Cox, T. Kerbusch, P. H. V. d. Graaf, and M. Danhof
Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of the Electroencephalogram Effect of Synthetic Opioids in the Rat: Correlation with the Interaction at the Mu-Opioid Receptor
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 1998; 284(3): 1095 - 1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
I. Jurna, W. Kömen, J. Baldauf, and W. Fleischer

J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 1997; 281(3): 1164 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
H. E. Shannon, M. J. Sheardown, F. P. Bymaster, D. O. Calligaro, N. W. Delapp, J. Gidda, C. H. Mitch, B. D. Sawyer, P. W. Stengel, J. S. Ward, et al.
Pharmacology of Butylthio[2.2.2] (LY297802/NNC11-1053): A Novel Analgesic with Mixed Muscarinic Receptor Agonist and Antagonist Activity
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 1997; 281(2): 884 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
S. Snyder
Drug and neurotransmitter receptors in the brain
Science, April 6, 1984; 224(4644): 22 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M Gavish, R. Goodman, and S. Snyder
Solubilized adenosine receptors in the brain: regulation of guanine nucleotides
Science, March 26, 1982; 215(4540): 1633 - 1635.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
K. Chang, A Lillian, E Hazum, P Cuatrecasas, and J. Chang
Morphiceptin (NH4-tyr-pro-phe-pro-COHN2): a potent and specific agonist for morphine (mu) receptors
Science, April 3, 1981; 212(4490): 75 - 77.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
S. Snyder
Brain peptides as neurotransmitters
Science, August 29, 1980; 209(4460): 976 - 983.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
C. Pert, A Pert, J. Chang, and B. Fong
(D-Ala2)-Met-enkephalinamide: a potent, long-lasting synthetic pentapeptide analgesic
Science, October 15, 1976; 194(4262): 330 - 332.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A Goldstein
Opioid peptides endorphins in pituitary and brain
Science, September 17, 1976; 193(4258): 1081 - 1086.
[PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1974 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics