MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROTH, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by GILLIS, C. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ROTH, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by GILLIS, C. N.

Molecular Pharmacology, Vol 11, 28-35, Copyright © 1975 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Some Structural Requirements for Inhibition of Type A and B Forms of Rabbit Monoamine Oxidase by Tricyclic Psychoactive Drugs

JEROME A. ROTH 1 and C. N. GILLIS 1

1 Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

We have determined the ability of several structurally related tricyclic antidepressant and tranquilizing drugs to inhibit both the type A form of monoamine oxidase (measured by 5-hydroxytryptamine deamination) and the type B form of the enzyme [measured by beta-phenylethylamine (PEA) deamination] of rabbit brain mitochondria. These studies indicate that both forms of the enzyme are inhibited by all tricyclic antidepressant drugs tested and that the B form of the oxidase is more susceptible to inhibition than the A form. Tricyclic drugs which have a double bond between the ring moiety and the aliphatic side chain were the most effective inhibitors of the B form of monoamine oxidase. Thus amitriptyline inhibited PEA deamination to the greatest extent, followed in decreasing order of effectiveness by chlorprothixene, imipramine, and chlorpromazine. Furthermore, chlorination in position 3 and hydroxylation in position 2 of imipramine and N-demethylation of amitriptyline did not alter the ability of the parent compound to inhibit the deamination of PEA. Chlorpromazine also inhibited PEA deamination, whereas the pharmacologically inactive tricyclic drug chlorpromazine sulfoxide failed to inhibit this oxidative reaction.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank the drug companies listed in Table 1 for providing samples of the compounds tested. We are grateful to Dr. R. Roth and Dr. B. S. Bunney for kindly supplying us with chlorimipramine, 7-hydroxychlorpromazine, and chlorpromazine sulfoxide, and to Dr. S. Gabay (Biochemical Research Laboratory, Veterans Administration Hospital, Brockton, Mass.) for sending us org GB 94.

Submitted on July 17, 1974







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1975 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics