MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MANYAN, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by YUNIS, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MANYAN, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by YUNIS, A. A.

Molecular Pharmacology, Vol 11, 520-527, Copyright © 1975 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Comparative Metabolic Effects Of Chloramphenicol Analogues

DAVID R. MANYAN 1, GRACE K. ARIMURA 1, and ADEL A. YUNIS 1

1 Departments of Medicine and Biochemistry, University of Miami School of Medicine, and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Miami, Florida 33152

Two groups of chloramphenicol analogues have been examined with respect to their effect on mitochondrial and Escherichia coli protein synthesis and on DNA synthesis in cultured human lymphoblastoid cells; one group of analogues with substitutions in the para position of the ring and another in which the substitutions were in the propanediol and dichloroacetamide moieties of the molecule. In general, substitutions in the propanediol or dichloroacetamide portion of the molecule had profound effects upon its capacity to inhibit both mitochondrial and E. coli protein synthesis. Although the patterns of inhibition of both mitochondrial and E. coli protein synthesis were similar with most of the analogues, there were several exceptions, suggesting some basic differences in these two processes. Substitutions in the para position of the molecule did not influence in any recognizable pattern its effect on either protein or DNA synthesis.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors wish to acknowledge the expert technical assistance of Miss Olga Carvajalino, who assisted in many phases of this work.

Submitted on February 25, 1975







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1975 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics