MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by OLSEN, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by BAN, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by OLSEN, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by BAN, M.

Molecular Pharmacology, Vol 11, 566-577, Copyright © 1975 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Binding of ggr-Aminobutyric Acid to Crayfish Muscle and Its Relationship to Receptor Sites

RICHARD W. OLSEN 1, JAMES M. LEE 1, and MATT BAN 1

1 Department of Biochemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92502

Binding of ggr-amino[14C]butyric acid (GABA) to crayfish muscle particulate fractions was measured by equilibrium dialysis at 0° in Tris-buffered Van Harreveld's solution containing beta-mercaptoethanol. Binding was found to saturate at about 7 pmoles/mg of particulate protein (200 pmoles/g of wet tissue), and the concentration of GABA giving halfmaximal binding was 1.3 ± 0.5 µM. A single class of binding sites exhibiting no cooperativity was apparently involved. GABA binding was insensitive to several treatments which would break cell membranes. It was partially inhibited by Na+-free conditions, but was less sensitive in this regard than membrane transport of GABA in either unhomogenized crayfish muscle or mouse brain particles. Binding, however, like transport, was inhibited by sulfhydryl reagents. Picrotoxin did not inhibit binding at 0.3 mM, but bicuculline was a weak inhibitor (K[unknown] = 350 µM). Chlorpromazine and imipramine were also weak inhibitors. The quantity, affinity, and tissue location of the binding sites were thus consistent with either synaptic receptor sites or transport binding sites. However, the Km value for GABA transport showed significantly lower affinity, 22 µM. Furthermore, comparison of inhibition potency for several GABA structural analogues revealed significant differences between binding and transport; in particular D-glutamic acid and imidazoleacetic acid inhibited binding but not transport; nipecotic acid inhibited transport but not binding. Reasonably good agreement in specificity was found for compounds active on GABA synaptic receptors and in inhibition of GABA binding. Although the concentration of GABA giving half-maximal binding is lower than the concentrations usually reported to give half-maximal synaptic responses, various explanations for this discrepancy are available. We conclude that these cell-free binding studies probably measure physiological GABA receptor sites, although high-affinity binding to sites involved in membrane transport or other biological activity of GABA could also contribute. Because of the lack of totally selective blocking agents, these sites cannot be unamibiguously distinguished at this time.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Jean-Pierre Changeux for suggesting this area of research, and Robert Barles, Patty Hasegawa, Walter Deal, Clement E. Furlong, Randall C. Willis, and Michael F. Dunn for helpful discussions. The technical assistance of J. D. Bayless is gratefully acknowledged, and we thank W. J. Vanderwoude for electron microscopy.

Submitted on January 7, 1975







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1975 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics