![]() |
|
|
Molecular Pharmacology, Vol 12, 813-819, Copyright © 1976 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
1 Departments of Biochemistry and Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New
York, New York 10032
Acetylcholine receptors in the innervated membrane of an electroplax cell from the
electric eel Electrophorus electricus may be affinity-labeled, after disulfide reduction, by
a variety of sulfhydryl alkylating and acylating agents. The conductance state of a cell
after this receptor modification remains under receptor control but is extremely sensitive both to the structure of the affinity reagent and, frequently, to the concentration
of the reagent during modification. When the affinity reagents 3-(
-bromomethyl)-3'-[
-(trimethylammonium)methyl]azobenzene bromide or 4-(4'-nitrophenoxycarbonyl)-phenyltrimethylammonium iodide are used in low concentration to label the receptor in
situ, subsequent sequential applications of disulfides and dithiothreitol give rise to
cycles of repolarization and depolarization of the innervated membrane. Since other
mild oxidizing agents cannot substitute for disulfides in this activation cycle, it is
concluded that the activation cycle arises from the reversible formation of a mixed
disulfide on the receptor. This mixed disulfide probably involves the remaining sulfhydryl group near the acetylcholine binding site, which is formed by the initial disulfide
reduction but not labeled by the affinity reagents. The membrane responses to these
chemical manipulations of the receptor in situ suggest useful criteria for evaluating the
similarity of an isolated receptor after reconstitution into black lipid membranes to the
receptor in its native state.
Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Dr. David Nachmansohn for his encouragement of this work. We also thank Drs. B.
Erlanger, A. Karlin, and H. Mautner and the
Squibb Institute for Medical Research for their generous gifts of the chemicals indicated under METHODS.