![]() |
|
|
Molecular Pharmacology, Vol 14, 24-37, Copyright © 1978 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
1 Institut de Biochimie, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
Prostaglandins E1, (PGE1) and E2 stimulated contractions of estrogen-treated rat uteri.
They also caused the accumulation of adenosine cyclic 3',5'-monophosphate (cAMP) in
the isolated myometrium and endometrium. Both stimulations were also induced by
arachidonic (C20:4) and homo-
-linoleic (C20:3) acids, which are direct precursors of
prostaglandins. Other unsaturated fatty acids, including oleic, linoleic,
-linolenic,
and eicosadienoic, were without effect. The stimulations of contraction and adenylate
cyclase activity by arachidonic and homo-
-linolenic acids were very rapid, detectable
at 30 sec, dose-dependent, and abolished by the specific cyclooxygenase inhibitors
indomethacin, meclofenamic acid, and eicosatetraynoic acid. Hence the conversion of
C20:3 and C20:4 fatty acids to prostaglandin or prostaglandin-like material occurred in
both myometrium and endometrium and was responsible for the observed activations.
The levels of cAMP can therefore be modulated by local prostaglandin effectors in a
manner similar to that produced by exogenous PGE compounds. The stimulatory
effects of arachidonic acid were followed by an unresponsive phase, as shown by the
subsequent inhibited responses of the myometrium to contractile agents such as
prostaglandins and carbamylcholine as well as by the suppression of adenylate cyclase
activation by either epinephrine or PGE2, in both endometrium and myometrium. The
latter inhibition was not readily reversible. It did not involve the prostaglandin
synthetase system, inasmuch as indomethacin failed to prevent the subsequent inhibitory effect of arachidonic acid. Furthermore, similar marked inhibition was exerted by
linoleic,
-linolenic, and eicosatetraynoic acids. These results suggest the possible
alteration by fatty acids of a membrane architecture crucial for adenylate cyclase
activation and signal transmission during hormone-induced contraction.
Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are indebted to Professor H. Clauser for his
support and helpful discussions. We wish to thank
Professor V . Najjar for valuable comments and
critically reviewing the manuscript. A special acknowledgment is extended to Mrs. Robichon for
technical assistance and Mrs. Crosnier for typing
the manuscript.