MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DE LEAN, A.
Right arrow Articles by RODBARD, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DE LEAN, A.
Right arrow Articles by RODBARD, D.

Molecular Pharmacology, Vol 15, 60-70, Copyright © 1979 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Multi-subsite Receptors for Multivalent Ligands

Application to Drugs, Hormones, and Neurotransmitters

ANDRE DE LEAN 1, PETER J. MUNSON 1, and DAVID RODBARD 1

1 Endocrinology and Reproduction Research Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20014

Detailed structure-activity relationships of many drugs and hormones indicate that ligand-receptor binding involves the interaction of several functional regions on the ligand with complementary receptor "subsites." However most hormone receptor binding models have been based on a simple bimolecular reaction obeying the mass action law. We present a quantitative reinterpretation in pharmacological terms of the theory of flexible polyvalent ligand binding. The model explains: 1) the occurrence of complex binding isotherms showing both apparent heterogeneous and cooperative binding sites; 2) bell-shaped dose response curves; 3) the properties of full and partial agonists; 4) how a given antagonist can be either "competitive" or "noncompetitive" depending on concentration used. The classical simple bimolecular interaction between drug and receptor is a limiting case of the model, when steric hindrance completely prevents multiple receptor occupancy, or when the ligand and the receptor interact in an all-or-none mode.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Charles De Lisi kindly reviewed the manuscript and provided many helpful suggestions. The numerical analysis was based in part on the methods of Feldman (39).

Submitted on April 28, 1978
Accepted on August 7, 1978




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Jacobs, O. Quraishi, X. Huang, N. Bousquet-Gagnon, G. Nault, N. Francella, W. G. Alvord, N. Pham, C. Soucy, M. Robitaille, et al.
A Covalent Inhibitor Targeting an Intermediate Conformation of the Fusogenic Subunit of the HIV-1 Envelope Complex
J. Biol. Chem., November 2, 2007; 282(44): 32406 - 32413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. R. J. Hoare, J. A. Clark, and T. B. Usdin
Molecular Determinants of Tuberoinfundibular Peptide of 39 Residues (TIP39) Selectivity for the Parathyroid Hormone-2 (PTH2) Receptor. N-TERMINAL TRUNCATION OF TIP39 REVERSES PTH2 RECEPTOR/PTH1 RECEPTOR BINDING SELECTIVITY
J. Biol. Chem., August 25, 2000; 275(35): 27274 - 27283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1979 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics