MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TAYLOR, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by RICHELSON, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TAYLOR, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by RICHELSON, E.

Molecular Pharmacology, Vol 15, 462-471, Copyright © 1979 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Desensitization of Histamine H1 Receptor-Mediated Cyclic GMP Formation in Mouse Neuroblastoma Cells

JOHN E. TAYLOR 1 and ELLIOTT RICHELSON 1

1 Departments of Psychiatry and Pharmacology, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55901

Histamine H1 receptor-mediated cyclic GMP formation by intact mouse neuroblastoma cells (clone N1E-115) was attenuated by prolonged exposure to histamine. This desensitization was dependent upon the concentration of histamine and at 10 µM the half-time was sime9 min, whereas the half-time for resensitization in the absence of histamine was sime13 min. The order of potency for agonist-induced desensitization correlated with the order of potency for stimulating the H1 receptor (histamine > 2-methylhistamine; 4-methylhistamine, no effect). Pyrilamine (50 nM) was more potent than metiamide (15 µM) in blocking desensitization by histamine. The ED50 for activation and for desensitization by histamine of the receptor-mediated response was approximately equal to its KA for the H1 receptor. Omission of Ca++ in the medium prevented cyclic GMP formation, but did not affect desensitization, suggesting that cyclic GMP formation was not required for the development of the desensitized state. Desensitization was temperature-dependent and marked inhibition of protein synthesis did not affect desensitization or its reversal. Finally, the ED50's for histamine-stimulated cyclic GMP formation in control and in partially desensitized cells were similar while the maximum response was reduced.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Drs. J. R. Blinks and F. G. Prendergast for helpful discussions.

Submitted on August 29, 1978
Accepted on December 4, 1978







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1979 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics