MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOLLENBERG, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by GREGORY, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HOLLENBERG, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by GREGORY, H.

Molecular Pharmacology, Vol 17, 314-320, Copyright © 1980 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Epidermal Growth Factor-Urogastrone: Biological Activity and Receptor Binding of Derivatives

MORLEY D. HOLLENBERG 1 and HAROLD GREGORY 2

1 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Departments of Medicine and of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
2 Pharmaceuticals Division ICI Ltd., Mereside, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, England SK10 4TG

We have examined the receptor binding (cultured human fibroblasts) and biological activities (stimulation of human fibroblast thymidine incorporation; inhibition of canine gastric acid secretion) of both human and mouse epidermal growth factor-urogastrone (EGF-URO) and of derivatives of these 53 amino acid polypeptides lacking up to six of the C-terminal amino acid residues. Both the human and the mouse polypeptides are biologically equipotent, although human EGF-URO possesses a two- to threefold higher human fibroblast receptor affinity than does mouse EGF-URO; binding kinetic methods designed to assess the receptor affinity of the unlabeled peptides indicate that the 125I-labeled peptides exhibit a lower fibroblast receptor affinity compared with native peptides. Whereas the shortened peptides (EGF-URO 1-47) are equipotent with the intact molecule (EGF-URO 1-53) in inhibiting gastric acid secretion, both mouse and human EGF-URO 1-47 are only one-tenth as potent as EGF-URO 1-53 in stimulating fibroblast thymidine incorporation; human EGF-URO 1-52 is equipotent with the intact peptide. Neither the human C-terminal hexapeptide (EGF-URO 48-53) nor the 48-52 pentapeptide interacts with the receptor. The reduced carboxamidated intact polypeptide is likewise inactive. In the presence of an excess of the C-terminal EGF-URO 48-53, EGF-URO 1-47 does not exhibit an increased biological potency. The reduced biological potencies of the shortened derivatives (EGF-URO 1-47) in fibroblasts are paralleled by reduced fibroblast receptor affinities, compared with the intact peptides. The data demonstrate the importance of the C-terminal sequence for the enhancement of receptor binding and biological activity in fibroblasts. Further, it appears that the structural requirements (and thus the receptor) related to the acid inhibitory activity differ from those related to the mitogenic activity of these polypeptides.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENT The incomparable technical assistance of W. H. Shackelford is gratefully acknowledged.

Submitted on May 29, 1979
Accepted on January 10, 1980




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
D P Calnan, A Fagbemi, J Berlanga-Acosta, T Marchbank, T Sizer, K Lakhoo, A D Edwards, and R J Playford
Potency and stability of C terminal truncated human epidermal growth factor
Gut, November 1, 2000; 47(5): 622 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. B. McGwire and R. A. Skidgel
Extracellular Conversion of Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) to des-Arg[IMAGE]-EGF by Carboxypeptidase M
J. Biol. Chem., July 21, 1995; 270(29): 17154 - 17158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1980 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics