MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RAO, A. G. A.
Right arrow Articles by CANN, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RAO, A. G. A.
Right arrow Articles by CANN, J. R.

Molecular Pharmacology, Vol 19, 295-301, Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

A Comparative Study of the Interaction of Chlorpromazine, Trifluoperazine, and Promethazine with Mouse Brain Tubulin

A. G. APPU RAO 1 and JOHN R. CANN 1

1 Department of Biophysics and Genetics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262

The comparative interaction of chlorpromazine, trifluoperazine, and promethazine with mouse brain tubulin has been examined via their effects on the assembly of tubulin in vitro, the circular dichroism of tubulin under nonpolymerizing conditions, and the fluorescence intensity of the protein. Of the two tranquilizing drugs, the more potent trifluoperazine inhibits assembly more strongly than does chlorpromazine, whereas the nontranquilizing drug promethazine does not inhibit but instead enhances assembly somewhat. Likewise, trifluoperazine has a stronger effect on the far-ultraviolet circular dichroic spectrum than does chlorpromazine, whereas promethazine is without effect. Thus, there are two separate correlations between biophysical measurements and the clinical potencies of these three phenothiazines. The fluorometric measurements, in turn, correlate in a provocative way with the assembly and circular dichroism results. The possible biological significance of these findings is discussed.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Mr. Robert O. Coombs for technical assistance, Dr. Jerry L. Brown for use of his spectrofluorometer for early measurements, and Dr. Philip G. Archer for mathematical consultation.

Submitted on August 6, 1980
Accepted on November 3, 1980







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics