MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EHLERT, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by YAMAMURA, H. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by EHLERT, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by YAMAMURA, H. I.

Molecular Pharmacology, Vol 19, 367-371, Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Mathematical Analysis of the Kinetics of Competitive Inhibition in Neurotransmitter Receptor Binding Assays

FREDERICK J. EHLERT 1, WILLIAM R. ROESKE 1, and HENRY I. YAMAMURA 1

1 Departments of Pharmacology, Psychiatry, and Internal Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, Arizona 85724

The kinetics of competitive inhibition was described by first-order differential equations, and the solution to these equations was derived numerically. The results of this analysis showed that the IC50 of a competitive inhibition curve decreases as equilibrium is approached if the dissociation rate constant of the nonlabeled ligand is equal to or less than that of the labeled ligand. The converse was true for competitive inhibition curves of a nonlabeled inhibitor with a dissociation rate constant greater than that of the labeled ligand. Nonequilibrium competitive inhibition experiments were performed using the muscarinic antagonist and agonist ligands, [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate and [3H]cis-methyldioxolane, and results consistent with the theoretical predictions were observed.

Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank Susan Yamamura for her expert appraisal of the manuscript. We also acknowledge the expert technical assistance of David Chapman and the excellent secretarial assistance of Cathleen Thomas and Isabelle Preiss.

Submitted on June 30, 1980
Accepted on December 29, 1980







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics