![]() |
|
|
Molecular Pharmacology, Vol 20, 484-491, Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Opiate
Receptors
1 Département de Chimie Organique ERA 613 du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et SCN 21 de l’Institut
National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Faculté de Pharmacie, 75006 Paris, et Laboratoire de Biophysique
Moléculaire ERA 828 du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Nancy I, Centre de 1er Cycle, C.O. 140,
54037 Nancy Cedex, France
A comparison of the inhibitory potency of rationally selected new analogues of enkephalins on the evoked contractions of guinea pig ileum (µ receptors) and mouse vas deferens
(
receptors) allowed the definition of the structural components required for specific
recognition of µ or
receptors. A high specificity for µ binding sites is obtained (a) by
shortening the enkephalin sequence and removing the terminal carboxyl group; (b) by
replacing the aromatic Phe4 residue with a lipophilic alkyl chain; and (c) by introducing
as a second residue a hydrophobic amino acid strictly of the D-configuration whose side-chain probably interacts with a specific µ-receptor subsite. Compared with methionine-enkephalin, such modifications lead to a 100-times loss of potency on mouse vas deferens
but a 2-fold enhanced activity on guinea pig ileum. These short peptides display a high
folding tendency as shown by 1H-NMR experiments and conformational calculations.
The low-energy conformer of the highest µ-specific peptide exhibits a T-shaped structure
similar to that of morphine, evidencing the close correspondence of several biologically
critical components in both compounds. All of the proposed µ-specific requirements
account for the reported variations in the biological activity of various modified enkephalms. The µ-agonist potency of endogenous enkephalins could be related to a fitting of
the side-chain of their fifth amino acid in the µ hydrophobic subsite. This feature is
precluded in Tyr-Gly-Gly-Phe and could explain its very low potency. The requirements
for
receptor specificity are even more strict and involve (a) an aromatic moiety in the
fourth position; (b) a conformational key role of the amino acid(s) following the Phe4,
improving the fitting of the Phe4 side-chain in a specific
-receptor subsite; and (c) a
lengthening of the enkephalin sequence and the introduction of a hydrophilic side-chain
in position 2 which decrease the µ specificity. These modifications lead to peptides almost
three orders of magnitude more active on mouse vas deferens than on guinea pig ileum.
On the whole, µ receptors bind preferentially highly hydrophobic compounds with
compact structures, whereas
receptors exhibit a stronger affinity for larger peptides with
hydrophilic components. These findings obtained at the periphery are corroborated at
the level of rat brain receptors by preliminary results from binding experiments. Thus
3H-labeled Tyr-D-Ser-Gly-Phe-Leu-Thr, the most selective
agonist, interacts exclusively
with
-binding sites at concentrations up to 20 nM. In contrast, Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-NH-CH(CH3)-CH2-CH(CH3)2 exhibits a specificity almost 50 times greater for µ receptors
than for
receptors as shown by competition experiments. This extensive structure-activity study could permit an exploration of the pharmacological significance of µ and
receptors through a rational design of highly specific ligands.
Note:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Monique David and Dr. Jean-Claude Meunier for binding
studies, Dr Yves Audigier for pharmacological assays on two compounds, Annick Bouju for typing the manuscript and Anne Kornowski
for stylistic revision.