MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Costa, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Costa, M.

Growth inhibition and metallothionein induction in cadmium-resistant cells by essential and non-essential metals

RM Evans, SR Patierno, DS Wang, O Cantoni and M Costa

Essential and non-essential metal ions were compared on the basis of their growth-inhibitory potency and their mediation of metallothionein induction in a Chinese hamster ovary cell line resistant to cadmium. Cadmium-resistant cells were found to be 20-fold and 6-fold more resistant than wild-type Chinese hamster ovary cells to the non- essential metals CdCl2 and HgCl2, respectively. In contrast, cadmium- resistant cells showed 2-fold or less resistance to growth inhibition due to the metals with known or possible biological essentiality, ZnCl2, CuSO4, CoCl2, and NiCl2. Resistance to either cadmium or mercury was not due to decreased uptake as measured isotopically or by X-ray fluorescence. At concentrations near the threshold of growth inhibition, CdCl2 and ZnCl2 induced metallothionein 8- to 10-fold above background levels in cadmium-resistant cells within 8-10 hr. A 2- to 3- fold induction of this protein was produced in resistant cells by levels of HgCl2, CuSO4, and CoCl2 near the threshold of growth inhibition whereas NiCl2 produced no measurable elevations of metallothionein at concentrations below, near, and above those that inhibit cell growth. Induction of metallothionein was measured by a modified 203Hg binding assay and by [35S]cysteine incorporation. No measurable induction of metallothionein was evident in wild-type cells with any metal treatment using a reasonable quantity of cells consistent with our assay. These results in cadmium-resistant cells demonstrate selective induction of metallothionein by various metals and suggest that induction of this protein alone is not solely responsible for differences in the growth-inhibitory potential of these elements.

Volume 24, Issue 1, pp. 77-83, 07/01/1983
Copyright © 1983 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics