MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gillard, M.
Right arrow Articles by Christophe, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gillard, M.
Right arrow Articles by Christophe, J.

Muscarinic receptor heterogeneity in rat central nervous system. II. Brain receptors labeled by [3H]oxotremorine-M correspond to heterogeneous M2 receptors with very high affinity for agonists

M Gillard, M Waelbroeck and J Christophe

We compared the binding characteristics of muscarinic receptors labeled by [3H]oxotremorine-M ([3H]oxo-M) in homogenates of brain cortex and heart from rat. In both tissues [3H]oxo-M bound, with the same KD (6.5 nM), to a fraction of the receptors labeled by [3H]-N-methylscopolamine ([3H]NMS). This [3H]oxo-M receptor population represented, respectively, 15-20% and 35-40% of the total number of [3H]NMS receptors in cortex and heart. The three unlabeled agonists oxotremorine, carbamylcholine, and pilocarpine, when tested in competition with [3H]oxo-M, displayed a homogeneous super high affinity toward [3H]oxo-M-labeled receptors, and were unable to discriminate between brain and heart receptors labeled by [3H]oxo-M. By contrast, selective muscarinic antagonists showed some selectivity for either brain or heart [3H]oxo-M-labeled receptors. We analyzed competition curves between [3H]oxo-M and secoverine, pirenzepine, AF-DX 116, dicyclomine, or gallamine, assuming the existence of one or two receptor subclasses. Heart muscarinic receptors labeled by [3H]oxo-M were homogeneous M2 receptors of the C type with very low affinity for pirenzepine (Ki = 400 nM). Brain [3H]oxo-M-labeled receptors were heterogeneous receptors, with 30% (the B type) having a higher affinity for dicyclomine and a lower affinity for AF-DX 116 and gallamine than cardiac receptors, whereas the remaining 70% (the C type) showed "cardiac-like" binding properties. Both [3H]oxo-M-labeled subtypes in cortex homogenates had a low affinity for pirenzepine, indicating that [3H]oxo-M labeled only B and C (M2) receptors in this tissue. GTP inhibited completely [3H]oxo-M binding in heart homogenates with an IC50 at 300 nM. In cortex homogenates, GTP showed the same potency, but its efficacy was much lower (with only 30% maximal inhibition). [3H]oxo- M dissociation kinetics were monophasic in heart homogenates and biphasic in cortex homogenates. [3H]oxo-M dissociation from both tissues was slowed by gallamine and d-tubocurarine and accelerated by GTP. We found no correlation between B versus C [3H]oxo-M receptors, GTP-sensitive versus GTP-insensitive receptors, and rapidly versus slowly dissociating receptors, suggesting that [3H] oxo-M labeled a large variety of muscarinic receptor-regulatory protein complexes, all having an SH affinity for agonists.

Volume 32, Issue 1, pp. 100-108, 07/01/1987
Copyright © 1987 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
A. Pignatelli and O. Belluzzi
Cholinergic Modulation of Dopaminergic Neurons in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb
Chem Senses, April 1, 2008; 33(4): 331 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. L. Peterson, A. Toumadje, W. C. Johnson Jr., and M. I. Schimerlik
Purification of Recombinant Porcine m2 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor from Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells
J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 1995; 270(30): 17808 - 17814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics