MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, R. W.

gamma-Aminobutyric acid receptor binding in fresh mouse brain membranes at 22 degrees C: ligand-induced changes in affinity

JS Yang and RW Olsen

Binding of [3H]muscimol to mouse brain gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors has been assayed under more physiological conditions (never- frozen membranes, 22 degrees) than in previous studies (0-4 degrees on frozen-thawed membranes). Binding affinities were lower and agreed more closely with physiological dose response curves. In addition, heterogeneity in affinity was still present, apparently due to a mixture of non-interconvertible subpopulations and ligand-induced changes in kinetics. Super-high affinity sites (Kd less than 10 nM) observed in frozen membranes were not observed in fresh membranes under equilibrium binding conditions, and high affinity sites (Kd congruent to 25 nM) seen at 0 degree had lower affinity (Kd congruent to 250 nM) at 22 degrees. Despite an apparent best fit single-component Scatchard plot for the latter data, cold ligand displacement and association and dissociation rates demonstrated heterogeneity of affinities. Pentobarbital greatly increased the amount of high affinity sites at the expense of low affinity sites in equilibrium binding at 0 degree and slightly increased affinity at 22 degrees. The kinetics of [3H]muscimol association at 22 degrees (kapp = 1-2/min) were virtually independent of the ligand concentration, suggesting either negative cooperativity or an agonist binding-dependent receptor isomerization. Dissociation triggered by addition of excess cold ligand to membranes equilibrated with [3H]muscimol at different concentrations revealed two off-rates with t1/2 values of under 10 sec and 1-3 min; unexpectedly, the ratio of these two populations did not vary with ligand concentration but was constant at 50:50. Dissociation triggered by infinite dilution gave two off-rates, but the slowest component had a t1/2 of about 20 min; including cold muscimol in the dilution buffer increased the off-rate toward that observed in the excess cold ligand method (t1/2 = 1-2 min). The very slow off-rate was only observed following removal of agonist from a previously occupied receptor and suggests receptor isomerization into a high affinity state; this state is similar to that observed at 0 degree. Pentobarbital also favored the production of the receptor state showing very slow [3H]muscimol dissociation upon infinite dilution, opposing the action of high receptor occupancy with cold muscimol. Thus, [3H]muscimol-binding sites observed at 22 degrees with fresh membranes do not show artificially high affinity and have a Kd of 0.2-0.3 microM, closer to the EC50 for chloride channel activation (approximately 2-3 microM and 0.4 microM with pentobarbital).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Volume 32, Issue 1, pp. 266-277, 08/01/1987
Copyright © 1987 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. G. Newell and S. M. J. Dunn
Functional Consequences of the Loss of High Affinity Agonist Binding to gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptors. IMPLICATIONS FOR RECEPTOR DESENSITIZATION
J. Biol. Chem., June 7, 2002; 277(24): 21423 - 21430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics