MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marvizon, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Skolnick, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marvizon, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Skolnick, P.

Anion regulation of [3H]strychnine binding to glycine-gated chloride channels is explained by the presence of two anion binding sites

JC Marvizon and P Skolnick

Laboratory of Neuroscience, National Institute of Diabetes Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

The effects of six monovalent anions (chloride, bromide, iodide, nitrate, perchlorate, and thiocyanate) on [3H]strychnine binding to glycine-gated chloride channels were examined. These anions have previously been shown to permeate glycine-gated chloride channels and stimulate [3H]strychnine binding. Whereas low concentrations (10-200 mM) of all these anions enhanced [3H]strychnine binding, higher concentrations (0.2-3 M) of thiocyanate, perchlorate, and iodide produced a robust inhibition of radioligand binding, and a more modest inhibition was observed with the same concentrations of nitrate and bromide. The presence of one binding site for anions at glycine-gated chloride channels can account for either the activation or the inhibition phase, but not both. However, these biphasic effects can be explained by the presence of two binding sites for anions at these channels. Two models with two anion binding sites were considered, the first assuming both allosteric activation and inhibition of the binding of the ligand, and the other explained by allosteric activation combined with competitive inhibition. Mathematical expressions for both models were formulated, and the equations obtained yielded satisfactory fitting to the results obtained with all anions tested in both concentration-response and saturation experiments. These equations also permitted the calculation of several parameters describing the interaction of the anions with these channels. The main difference in the behavior of these anions relates to the extent to which they produce activation of [3H]strychnine binding and to their cooperative interaction at the two putative anion binding sites. Thus, a strong negative cooperativity was observed for the simultaneous binding of two molecules of chloride, bromide, or nitrate, but not for the simultaneous binding of thiocyanate, perchlorate, or iodide. This latter property may be related to the conductance of these anions through glycine-gated chloride channels.

Volume 34, Issue 6, pp. 806-813, 12/01/1988
Copyright © 1988 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1988 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics