Molecular determinants of benzodiazepine receptor affinities and anticonvulsant activities

HO Villar, ET Uyeno, L Toll, W Polgar, MF Davies and GH Loew

SRI International, Menlo Park, California 94025.

In vivo convulsant activities profiles and receptor binding studies together with the techniques of theoretical chemistry were used to characterize 15 compounds, from five different chemical families, known to bind to the BDZ receptor. The experimental goals of this study were to determine the affinity of these analogs for this receptor, the effect of gamma-aminobutyric acid on the affinity, and, in a self- consistent manner, the nature of the activity, agonist (anticonvulsant), antagonist, or inverse agonist (proconvulsant, convulsant), elicited by binding to this receptor. To these ends, in vivo studies were made to determine the proconvulsant, convulsant, and anticonvulsant activities and antagonism to anticonvulsant activities of the 15 analogs. Their receptor affinities at 25 degrees were also determined by competitive inhibition of [3H] flunitrazepam and [3H]Ro 15-1788 in the absence and presence of gamma-aminobutyric acid. The goal of the theoretical studies was to identify and calculate molecular properties that modulate these affinities and types of activities and from them to develop a model of receptor recognition and activation that could consistently explain observed behavior and predict new results. Thus, molecular orbital calculations were carried out for all analogs, using semiempirical quantum mechanical methods. In addition to the optimization of structures, a number of electronic properties, such as polarizations, partition coefficients, and proton and electron affinities were computed and examined for their ability to modulate relative affinities and modes of activation of the receptor. From these studies, a model for receptor recognition involving two anchoring hydrogen bond-acceptor sites and for activation involving interaction of the most lipophilic aromatic region of each compound with the receptor was developed, which could systematically account for the three different types of behavior, agonist, antagonist, and inverse agonist, observed for these analogs. Electronic rather than structural properties were found to be the principal modulator of both recognition and activation. A possible mechanism of agonist activation of the receptor involving electron transfer to the agonist, as well as a possible induced conformational change in the receptor, is also suggested by these results. Finally, by complementarity, some steric and electronic characteristics of the receptor binding site could be deduced.

Volume 36, Issue 4, pp. 589-600, 10/01/1989
Copyright © 1989 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Berezhnoy, Y. Nyfeler, A. Gonthier, H. Schwob, M. Goeldner, and E. Sigel On the Benzodiazepine Binding Pocket in GABAA Receptors J. Biol. Chem., January 30, 2004; 279(5): 3160 - 3168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. J. Dunn, M. Davies, A. L. Muntoni, and J. J. Lambert Mutagenesis of the Rat alpha 1 Subunit of the gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptor Reveals the Importance of Residue 101 in Determining the Allosteric Effects of Benzodiazepine Site Ligands Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 1999; 56(4): 768 - 774. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. Sigel, M. T. Schaerer, A. Buhr, and R. Baur The Benzodiazepine Binding Pocket of Recombinant alpha 1beta 2gamma 2 gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors: Relative Orientation of Ligands and Amino Acid Side Chains Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 1998; 54(6): 1097 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. M. McKernan, S. Farrar, I. Collins, F. Emms, A. Asuni, K. Quirk, and H. Broughton Photoaffinity Labeling of the Benzodiazepine Binding Site of alpha 1beta 3gamma 2 gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptors with Flunitrazepam Identifies a Subset of Ligands that Interact Directly with His102 of the alpha  Subunit and Predicts Orientation of These within the Benzodiazepine Pharmacophore Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 1998; 54(1): 33 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text]