MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Emini, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Emini, E. A.

Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus-1 reverse transcriptase activity by rubromycins: competitive interaction at the template.primer site

ME Goldman, GS Salituro, JA Bowen, JM Williamson, DL Zink, WA Schleif and EA Emini

Department of New Lead Pharmacology, Merck Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486.

Rubromycins, a class of quinone antibacterials, were discovered to selectively inhibit human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) RNA-directed DNA polymerase (reverse transcriptase) (RT) activity more potently than cellular DNA polymerase alpha. beta- and gamma-rubromycin each inhibited equipotently HIV-1 RT and avian myeloblastosis virus RT, in a concentration-dependent manner, and were significantly weaker as inhibitors of calf thymus DNA polymerase alpha. These agents inhibited HIV-1 RT reversibly, were competitive with respect to template.primer, and were noncompetitive with respect to TTP. Dixon analyses yielded HIV RT Ki values of 0.27 +/- 0.014 and 0.13 +/- 0.012 microM for beta- and gamma-rubromycin, respectively. Similarly, using DNA polymerase alpha, the Ki values were 25.1 +/- 4.3 and 3.9 +/- 0.6 microM for beta- and gamma-rubromycin, respectively. Because these agents were toxic to noninfected human T lymphoid cells using concentrations at or above 6 microM, HIV-1 infectivity studies were carried out at 0.8-6 microM. At these concentrations, which are below the range expected to provide protection, no significant antiviral activity was observed. Although beta- and gamma-rubromycins did not possess sufficient HIV RT inhibitory potency or selectivity versus mammalian DNA polymerase to demonstrate antiviral activities, these studies support the hypothesis that specific molecules containing quinone functional groups can selectively inhibit viral polymerase activities over cellular polymerase activities. In addition, these studies suggest that rubromycins may be lead structures for the development of more potent and selective agents.

Volume 38, Issue 1, pp. 20-25, 07/01/1990
Copyright © 1990 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics