![]() |
|
|
J Wess, TI Bonner and MR Brann
Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
The cloning and expression of five mammalian muscarinic receptor genes (m1-m5) have shown that the individual receptor subtypes differ in their functional and ligand-binding properties. To study the role of the carboxyl terminal receptor domains in this pharmacological diversity, we constructed chimeric m2/m3 receptors in which a region comprising part of transmembrane domain VI, the third extracellular loop, transmembrane region VII, and the cytoplasmic tail (collectively referred to as C-terminal domains) was exchanged between the human m2 and the rat m3 receptor. The ability of the cloned receptors to mediate stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis and to bind subtype- selective muscarinic ligands was studied after their transient expression in COS-7 cells. Whereas wild-type m3 strongly stimulated phosphoinositide breakdown, wild-type m2 gave only a poor response. Exchange of the C-terminal domains between m2 and m3 had no significant effect on the magnitude of these responses. In N-[3H]methylscopolamine competition binding studies, the muscarinic antagonists AF-DX 116 and methoctramine showed 11- and 23-fold higher affinities, respectively, for m2 than for m3, whereas hexahydro-silad-ifenidol (HHSiD) and 4- diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methiodide (4-DAMP) displayed the reverse selectivity profile, having approximately 10-fold higher affinities for m3. In comparison with wild-type m3, the mutant m3 receptor containing the C-terminal domains of m2 displayed 2.5- and 8- fold higher affinities for AF-DX 116 and methoctramine but 7- and 3- fold lower affinities for HHSiD and 4-DAMP, respectively. The mutant m2 receptor with the C-terminal domains of m3 showed 2-3-fold lower affinities for AF-DX 116 and methoctramine but 2-3-fold higher affinities for HHSiD and 4-DAMP, as compared with wild-type m2. These data suggest that the C-terminal domains of the muscarinic receptors are not involved in conferring selectivity of coupling to phosphoinositide hydrolysis but contain major structural determinants of antagonist binding selectivity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. L. Matsumoto, K. Narzinski, G. V. Nikiforovich, and T. J. Baranski A Comprehensive Structure-Function Map of the Intracellular Surface of the Human C5a Receptor: II. ELUCIDATION OF G PROTEIN SPECIFICITY DETERMINANTS J. Biol. Chem., February 2, 2007; 282(5): 3122 - 3133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Yin, S. Gavi, H.-y. Wang, and C. C. Malbon Probing Receptor Structure/Function with Chimeric G-Protein-Coupled Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2004; 65(6): 1323 - 1332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Liu, G. Sandford, G. Fei, and J. Nicholas G{alpha} Protein Selectivity Determinant Specified by a Viral Chemokine Receptor-Conserved Region in the C Tail of the Human Herpesvirus 8 G Protein-Coupled Receptor J. Virol., March 1, 2004; 78(5): 2460 - 2471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Novi, M. Scarselli, G. U. Corsini, and R. Maggio An Unusual Form of the Association Binding Kinetics of N-[3H]Methylscopolamine to the Split Muscarinic M2trunk/M2tail Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2003; 305(2): 786 - 795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Buller, D. P. Zlotos, K. Mohr, and J. Ellis Allosteric Site on Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors: A Single Amino Acid in Transmembrane Region 7 Is Critical to the Subtype Selectivities of Caracurine V Derivatives and Alkane-Bisammonium Ligands Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2002; 61(1): 160 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Y.-Y. Chan, R. T.-K. Pang, and B. K.-C. Chow Functional Segregation of the Highly Conserved Basic Motifs within the Third Endoloop of the Human Secretin Receptor Endocrinology, September 1, 2001; 142(9): 3926 - 3934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Ríos, K. Forde, Y. Diebold, J. Lightman, J. D. Zieske, and D. A. Dartt Development of Conjunctival Goblet Cells and Their Neuroreceptor Subtype Expression Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2000; 41(8): 2127 - 2137. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Arai, C.-L. Tsou, and I. F. Charo Chemotaxis in a lymphocyte cell line transfected with C-C chemokine receptor 2B: Evidence that directed migration is mediated by beta gamma dimers released by activation of Galpha i-coupled receptors PNAS, December 23, 1997; 94(26): 14495 - 14499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kostenis, J. Gomeza, C. Lerche, and J. Wess Genetic Analysis of Receptor-Galpha q Coupling Selectivity J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 1997; 272(38): 23675 - 23681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Blin, J. Yun, and J. Wess Mapping of Single Amino Acid Residues Required for Selective Activation of G[IMAGE] by the m3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 1995; 270(30): 17741 - 17748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-J. Tseng, S. Coon, E. Stuenkel, V. Struk, and C. D. Logsdon Influence of Second and Third Cytoplasmic Loops on Binding, Internalization, and Coupling of Chimeric Bombesin/m3 Muscarinic Receptors J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 1995; 270(30): 17884 - 17891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||