MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, W.
Right arrow Articles by Triggle, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, W.
Right arrow Articles by Triggle, D. J.

Pharmacologic and radioligand binding studies of 1,4-dihydropyridines in rat cardiac and vascular preparations: stereoselectivity and voltage dependence of antagonist and activator interactions

W Zheng, J Stoltefuss, S Goldmann and DJ Triggle

Department of Biochemical Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, State University of New York, Buffalo 14260.

The pharmacologic and radioligand-binding properties of 1,4- dihydropyridines in an activator (Bay K 8644) and an antagonist (nifedipine) series were studied in rat tail artery, heart membrane, and neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. The S-enantiomers of the activator series contracted rat tail artery in the presence of 15 mM K+ (EC50 values of 10(-8) to 10(-5) M). (S)-Bay K 8644 (I) and its o- difluoromethoxy analog (III) were the most potent members of the activator series examined. The abilities of the activators to stimulate maximum tension response of the artery differed with structure; thus, the efficacy of (S)-Bay K 8644 was 70% that of the analog lacking the 3- carbomethoxy group. The R-enantiomers of the activator series and a series of achiral nifedipine analogs were inhibitory in the same tissue. The intact-cell binding assay revealed the binding affinities of 1,4-dihydropyridine antagonists in depolarized cells (50 mM K+) to be higher than those in polarized cells (5 mM K+). The ratio KD (polarized)/KD (depolarized) was 77 for nifedipine (IC50 = 5.4 x 10(-9) M) but was only 2.9 for the weak 3-methoxy nifedipine analog (IC50 = 4.8 x 10(-6) M); an approximately linear relationship exists between this ratio and the antagonist potency. In marked contrast, and in confirmation of previous work [Mol. Pharmacol. 35:541-552 (1989)], the binding affinities of activators were not significantly affected by membrane potential, regardless of potency. We conclude that the S- enantiomers of Bay K 8644 analogs are activators with different potency and efficacy and that the R-enantiomers are antagonists, that the binding of 1,4-dihydropyridine antagonists is voltage dependent, whereas binding of the activators is not, and that the voltage- dependence of binding of the antagonists is correlated with the potency of the antagonist.

Volume 41, Issue 3, pp. 535-541, 03/01/1992
Copyright © 1992 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
P. Liao, T. F. Yong, M. C. Liang, D. T. Yue, and T. W. Soong
Splicing for alternative structures of Cav1.2 Ca2+ channels in cardiac and smooth muscles
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2005; 68(2): 197 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
L. Valencia, M. Bidet, S. Martial, E. Sanchez, E. Melendez, M. Tauc, C. Poujeol, D. Martin, M. D. C. Namorado, J. L. Reyes, et al.
Nifedipine-activated Ca2+ permeability in newborn rat cortical collecting duct cells in primary culture
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): C1193 - C1203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics