MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wienen, W.
Right arrow Articles by Entzeroth, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wienen, W.
Right arrow Articles by Entzeroth, M.

Different types of receptor interaction of peptide and nonpeptide angiotensin II antagonists revealed by receptor binding and functional studies

W Wienen, AB Mauz, JC Van Meel and M Entzeroth

Department of Pharma Research, Dr. Karl Thomae GmbH, Biberach, Germany.

The pharmacological effects of angiotensin II (AII) are potently inhibited by several peptide and recently synthesized nonpeptide AII receptor antagonists. The interaction of sarcosine1, isoleucine8-AII (sarile), sarcosine1,O-methyltyrosine4-AII (sarmesin), and the nonpeptide AII antagonists 2-n-butyl-4-chloro-5- hydroxymethyl-1-[(2'- (1H-tetrazole-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)- methyl]imidazole (DuP 753, Losartan potassium) and its metabolite 2-n-butyl-4-chloro-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazole-5- yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl]imidaz ole - 5-carboxylic acid (EXP3174) with AII binding sites was investigated in radioligand binding and functional studies. Sarile, sarmesin, DuP 753, and EXP3174 inhibited 125I-AII binding to rat lung tissue, with Ki values of 3.5, 16.1, 23.7, and 10.4 nM, respectively. The Hill coefficients of all displacement curves, except for sarile (nH, 1.45), were not significantly different from unity. In functional experiments using rabbit aorta, sarmesin and DuP 753 competitively inhibited the contractile response to AII, with pA2 values of 6.75 and 8.01, respectively. Sarile, in contrast, revealed noncompetitive antagonism, i.e., the maximum contractile force and the slope of the concentration-contractile force curve were significantly and concentration-dependently depressed. The concentration-contractile response curve for AII was shifted to the right in a parallel fashion in the presence of EXP3174 (3 nM to 1 microM); however, the maximum contractile force was significantly decreased, by 24%. The marked noncompetitive antagonism of sarile (3 nM) was reversed in the presence of increasing concentrations of sarmesin (30 nM to 30 microM) or DuP 753 (10 nM to 1 microM), whereas in the presence of increasing concentrations of EXP3174 (3-300 nM) a 25% depression in maximum contractile force persisted. Moreover, the reduction of the maximum contractile force by EXP3174 (10 nM) was concentration-dependently restored in the presence of increasing concentrations of DuP 753 (10 nM to 1 microM), indicating interaction with the same binding site. Whereas sarile (0.3-10 nM) did not affect the 125I-AII binding capacity in radioligand saturation experiments, a 54% reduction of Bmax was observed in the presence of 100 nM EXP3174. The data provide evidence that all antagonists inhibit the functional response to AII by interacting with a common binding site at the receptor. The noncompetitive behavior of sarile seems to be due to slow dissociation from this receptor site. An additional mechanism must be postulated for EXP3174. An allosteric interaction with the receptor, as suggested by the reduction in Bmax, may be, at least in part, responsible for the nonclassical antagonism of this compound.

Volume 41, Issue 6, pp. 1081-1088, 06/01/1992
Copyright © 1992 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
R. M. van der Hee, T. Deurholt, C. C. Gerhardt, and E. M. de Groene
Comparison of 3 AT1 Receptor Binding Assays: Filtration Assay, ScreenReadyTM Target, and WGA Flashplate(R)
J Biomol Screen, March 1, 2005; 10(2): 118 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. C. Reid, C. J. Mackins, N. Seyedi, R. Levi, and R. B. Silver
Coupling of angiotensin II AT1 receptors to neuronal NHE activity and carrier-mediated norepinephrine release in myocardial ischemia
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2004; 286(4): H1448 - H1454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. P. Maillard, C. Perregaux, C. Centeno, J. Stangier, W. Wienen, H.-R. Brunner, and M. Burnier
In Vitro and in Vivo Characterization of the Activity of Telmisartan: An Insurmountable Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2002; 302(3): 1089 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
G. Vauquelin, F. L. Fierens, I. Verheijen, and P. M. Vanderheyden
Distinctions between non-peptide angiotensin II AT1-receptor antagonists
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2001; 2(1_suppl): S24 - S31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
R. Maruyama, E. Hatta, K. Yasuda, N. C. E. Smith, and R. Levi
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-Independent Angiotensin Formation in a Human Model of Myocardial Ischemia: Modulation of Norepinephrine Release by Angiotensin Type 1 and Angiotensin Type 2 Receptors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2000; 294(1): 248 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics