MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graeser, D.
Right arrow Articles by Neubig, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Graeser, D.
Right arrow Articles by Neubig, R. R.

Compartmentation of receptors and guanine nucleotide-binding proteins in NG108-15 cells: lack of cross-talk in agonist binding among the alpha 2-adrenergic, muscarinic, and opiate receptors

D Graeser and RR Neubig

Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109- 0626.

Many different types of receptors couple to the inhibitory guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein) Gi. In NG108-15 neuroblastoma- glioma cells, alpha 2b-adrenergic, m4 muscarinic, and delta-opiate receptors all use Gi as a transducer. According to the ternary complex model of receptor-G protein interactions, agonists bind to these receptors with high affinity only in their G protein-associated form. Conversely, G protein affinity for the receptor is increased by agonist binding. We have developed an extended ternary complex model in which multiple receptors couple to a single G protein and we have examined two consequences of the model theoretically and experimentally. First, the simple ternary complex model can account for the observed high and low affinity agonist binding only when G protein is limiting; however, measurements show a significant excess of G protein over receptor. Could this paradox be explained by other receptors competing for the same G protein and limiting the amount of free G protein so that high and low affinity agonist binding would be seen? Our theoretical simulations show that this does not occur unless the receptors and G protein are present in a precise stoichiometric ratio and have an extremely high affinity, such as when agonists for both receptors are present. The second prediction of this model is that binding of an agonist at one receptor should produce competition for G protein used by another receptor. If the G protein pool were limiting and freely mobile, this would result in an unlabeled agonist at one receptor decreasing binding of a radiolabeled agonist to another receptor. Experimentally, the G protein was made limiting by a partial pertussis toxin treatment. Radioligand binding to alpha 2b-adrenergic and m4 muscarinic receptors in these pertussis toxin-treated NG108-15 membranes showed no cross-talk with the delta-opiate or muscarinic receptors, which are present in excess. This could occur because the different receptors interact with structurally different G proteins (e.g., distinct beta or gamma subunits). More likely it is because of limitations of the mobility of G proteins in the membrane due to 1) attachment to structural elements, such as the cytoskeleton, 2) sequestration in lipid pools, or 3) organization into slowly exchanging supramolecular complexes. These results show that we must reexamine the assumptions of the collision coupling and ternary complex models.

Volume 43, Issue 3, pp. 434-443, 03/01/1993
Copyright © 1993 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
K. Qin, P. R. Sethi, and N. A. Lambert
Abundance and stability of complexes containing inactive G protein-coupled receptors and G proteins
FASEB J, August 1, 2008; 22(8): 2920 - 2927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. H. Berlot
A Highly Effective Dominant Negative alpha s Construct Containing Mutations That Affect Distinct Functions Inhibits Multiple Gs-coupled Receptor Signaling Pathways
J. Biol. Chem., May 31, 2002; 277(23): 21080 - 21085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
R. S Ostrom
New Determinants of Receptor-Effector Coupling: Trafficking and Compartmentation in Membrane Microdomains
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2002; 61(3): 473 - 476.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
L. Yao, K. Asai, Z. Jiang, A. Ishii, P. Fan, A. S. Gordon, and I. Diamond
Dopamine D2 Receptor Inhibition of Adenylyl Cyclase Is Abolished by Acute Ethanol but Restored after Chronic Ethanol Exposure (Tolerance)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2001; 298(2): 833 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
A. Alt, I. J. McFadyen, C. D. Fan, J. H. Woods, and J. R. Traynor
Stimulation of Guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate Binding in Digitonin-Permeabilized C6 Rat Glioma Cells: Evidence for an Organized Association of {micro}-Opioid Receptors and G Protein
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2001; 298(1): 116 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. Li, J. C. Bermak, Z. W. Wang, and Q. Y. Zhou
Modulation of Dopamine D2 Receptor Signaling by Actin-Binding Protein (ABP-280)
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2000; 57(3): 446 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. W. Edwards and L. E. Limbird
Role for the Third Intracellular Loop in Cell Surface Stabilization of the alpha 2A-Adrenergic Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., June 4, 1999; 274(23): 16331 - 16336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
P. G. Szekeres and J. R. Traynor
Delta Opioid Modulation of the Binding of Guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate to NG108-15 Cell Membranes: Characterization of Agonist and Inverse Agonist Effects
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 1997; 283(3): 1276 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. A. Wreggett and J. W. Wells
Cooperativity Manifest in the Binding Properties of Purified Cardiac Muscarinic Receptors
J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 1995; 270(38): 22488 - 22499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Sato, R. Kataoka, J. Dingus, M. Wilcox, J. D. Hildebrandt, and S. M. Lanier
Factors Determining Specificity of Signal Transduction by G-protein-coupled Receptors
J. Biol. Chem., June 23, 1995; 270(25): 15269 - 15276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics