Interactions of indolo[3,2-b]carbazoles and related polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with specific binding sites for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo- p-dioxin in rat liver

M Gillner, J Bergman, C Cambillau, M Alexandersson, B Fernstrom and JA Gustafsson

Department of Medical Nutrition, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital F60, NOVUM, Sweden.

In the present study we have investigated the capacity of various compounds sterically related to indolo[3,2-b]carbazole to inhibit specific 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro[1,6-3H]dibenzo-p-dioxin binding in rat liver cytosol, as analyzed by electrofocusing in polyacrylamide gels. When the two nitrogen atoms of indolo[3,2-b]carbazole (IC50 = 3.6 nM) were replaced with sulfur atoms, the affinity for the specific binding sites (IC50 = 3.3 nM) was similar to that of the parent compound, whereas the affinity decreased when the two nitrogen atoms were replaced with oxygen atoms (IC50 = 29 nM). Substitution with methyl groups at positions 5 and 11 (on the nitrogens) of indolo[3,2- b]carbazole resulted in increased affinity (IC50 = 1.2 nM), compared with that of the parent compound, whereas dimethylation at the 4,10- or 2,8-positions decreased the affinity (IC50 = 19 nM and IC50 > 150 nM, respectively). Substitution at positions 5 and 11 of indolo[3,2- b]carbazole with substituents larger than methyl, as in 5,11- diethylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole (IC50 = 8.9 nM), diacetylindolo[3,2- b]carbazole (IC50 = 11.2 nM), 5,11-dibutylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole (IC50 > 150 nM), and 5,11-di(N,N-dimethylaminoethyl)indolo[3,2-b]carbazole (IC50 > 1500 nM), also decreased the affinity. Introduction of oxygen in, or hydroxylation of, the middle ring of indolo[3,2-b]carbazole, giving indolo[3,2-b]carbazole-6,12-quinone (IC50 > 150 nM) or 6,12- dihydroxyindolo[3,2-b]carbazole (IC50 > 1500 nM), respectively, also lowered the affinity. We calculated the Gibbs free energy of solvation of the analogue isoquino[3,4-b]phenanthridine (IC50 = 137 nM), relative to that of dibenz[a,h]anthracene (IC50 = 2.5 nM), in water to be -6 kcal/mol by free energy perturbation, which indicates that the most important explanation for the observed difference in binding affinity is the smaller difference in relative free energy of binding at the binding sites, compared with the Gibbs free energy of solvation of the two compounds.

Volume 44, Issue 2, pp. 336-345, 08/01/1993
Copyright © 1993 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. L. Petersen, S. Krishnan, and E. D. Hudgens The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Pathway and Sexual Differentiation of Neuroendocrine Functions Endocrinology, June 1, 2006; 147(6): s33 - s42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Diani-Moore, E. Labitzke, R. Brown, A. Garvin, L. Wong, and A. B. Rifkind Sunlight Generates Multiple Tryptophan Photoproducts Eliciting High Efficacy CYP1A Induction in Chick Hepatocytes and In Vivo Toxicol. Sci., March 1, 2006; 90(1): 96 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Backlund and M. Ingelman-Sundberg Different Structural Requirements of the Ligand Binding Domain of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor for High- and Low-Affinity Ligand Binding and Receptor Activation Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2004; 65(2): 416 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Bergander, N. Wahlstrom, T. Alsberg, J. Bergman, A. Rannug, and U. Rannug Characterization of in Vitro Metabolites of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Ligand 6-Formylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and NMR. Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2003; 31(2): 233 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Seidel, V. Li, G. M. Winter, W. J. Rogers, E. I. Martinez, and M. S. Denison Ah Receptor-Based Chemical Screening Bioassays: Application and Limitations for the Detection of Ah Receptor Agonists Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2000; 55(1): 107 - 115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. C. Henry, A. S. Kende, G. Rucci, M. J. Totleben, J. J. Willey, S. D. Dertinger, R. S. Pollenz, J. P. Jones, and T. A. Gasiewicz Flavone Antagonists Bind Competitively with 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin (TCDD) to the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor But Inhibit Nuclear Uptake and Transformation Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 1999; 55(4): 716 - 725. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. J. Reiners Jr. and R. E. Clift Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Regulation of Ceramide-induced Apoptosis in Murine Hepatoma 1c1c7 Cells. A FUNCTION INDEPENDENT OF ARYL HYDROCARBON RECEPTOR NUCLEAR TRANSLOCATOR J. Biol. Chem., January 22, 1999; 274(4): 2502 - 2510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Dzeletovic, J. McGuire, M. Daujat, J. Tholander, M. Ema, Y. Fujii-Kuriyama, J. Bergman, P. Maurel, and L. Poellinger Regulation of Dioxin Receptor Function by Omeprazole J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 1997; 272(19): 12705 - 12713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Coumailleau, L. Poellinger, J.Åk. Gustafsson, and M. L. Whitelaw Definition of a Minimal Domain of the Dioxin Receptor That Is Associated with Hsp90 and Maintains Wild Type Ligand Binding Affinity and Specificity J. Biol. Chem., October 20, 1995; 270(42): 25291 - 25300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-H. Chen, J. Riby, P. Srivastava, J. Bartholomew, M. Denison, and L. Bjeldanes Regulation of CYP1A1 by Indolo[3,2-b]carbazole in Murine Hepatoma Cells J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 1995; 270(38): 22548 - 22555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]