MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sibley, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sibley, D. R.

The D2S and D2L dopamine receptor isoforms are differentially regulated in Chinese hamster ovary cells

LJ Zhang, JE Lachowicz and DR Sibley

Molecular Neuropharmacology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

To investigate and compare the regulatory properties of the two isoforms of the D2 dopamine receptor, we have stably expressed their cDNAs in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Cell lines were selected that express similar levels of [3H]methylspiperone-binding activity. Both isoforms mediate a dose-dependent and pharmacologically specific inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity in both intact cell and membrane preparations. Pretreatment of both D2L and D2S receptor- expressing cells with 100 microM dopamine produces a approximately 5- fold shift (to lower affinity) in the EC50 for dopamine inhibition of cAMP accumulation, with a 25-30% decrease in the maximum response. Dopamine treatment also results in a approximately 25% decrease in the maximum receptor binding activity of the D2S receptor-expressing cells. In contrast, the D2L receptors are up-regulated by about 2-fold in response to dopamine exposure. This difference in response between the D2S and D2L receptors is not cell line specific, inasmuch as other CHO clones expressing these isoforms show identical responses. The dopamine- induced up-regulation of D2L receptor binding is time dependent, reaching maximal levels after 10 hr (t1/2 = 2 hr). Upon removal of dopamine, the receptor binding activity returns to control levels within 20 hr. The adenylyl cyclase desensitization response is also time dependent but exhibits a slower time course (t1/2 = 5 hr) than the receptor up-regulation. Both regulatory responses are induced in a dose- dependent fashion by dopamine, albeit with different potencies (up- regulation EC50 = 100 nM, desensitization EC50 = 2 microM). These regulatory effects are pharmacologically specific, being mimicked by D2- selective agonists but not agonists of other receptor subtypes. The dopamine-induced receptor up-regulation is blocked by prior treatment of the cells with pertussis toxin and is not mimicked by cAMP analogs. Conversely, elevation of intracellular cAMP levels results in down- regulation of the D2L receptor activity. To test whether protein synthesis is required for the D2L receptor up-regulation, cycloheximide was used to block mRNA translation. This was found to completely inhibit the up-regulation of D2L binding activity; however, there was no effect on the desensitization of the adenylyl cyclase response. RNA dot-blot analyses indicate that dopamine treatment is associated with a sustained 2-fold increase in the steady state levels of D2L mRNA, whereas D2S mRNA is transiently increased by only 50%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Volume 45, Issue 5, pp. 878-889, 05/01/1994
Copyright © 1994 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
P.-A. Vidi, B. R. Chemel, C.-D. Hu, and V. J. Watts
Ligand-Dependent Oligomerization of Dopamine D2 and Adenosine A2A Receptors in Living Neuronal Cells
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2008; 74(3): 544 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
C. H. So, V. Verma, B. F. O'Dowd, and S. R. George
Desensitization of the Dopamine D1 and D2 Receptor Hetero-Oligomer Mediated Calcium Signal by Agonist Occupancy of Either Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2007; 72(2): 450 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. F. Lopez-Aranda, M. J. Acevedo, A. Gutierrez, P. Koulen, and Z. U. Khan
Role of a G{alpha}i2 protein splice variant in the formation of an intracellular dopamine D2 receptor pool
J. Cell Sci., July 1, 2007; 120(13): 2171 - 2178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
C. H. So, G. Varghese, K. J. Curley, M. M. C. Kong, M. Alijaniaram, X. Ji, T. Nguyen, B. F. O'Dowd, and S. R. George
D1 and D2 Dopamine Receptors Form Heterooligomers and Cointernalize after Selective Activation of Either Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2005; 68(3): 568 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
L. Thielemans, I. Depoortere, J. Perret, P. Robberecht, Y. Liu, T. Thijs, C. Carreras, E. Burgeon, and T. L. Peeters
Desensitization of the Human Motilin Receptor by Motilides
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2005; 313(3): 1397 - 1405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
T. A. Macey, V. V. Gurevich, and K. A. Neve
Preferential Interaction between the Dopamine D2 Receptor and Arrestin2 in Neostriatal Neurons
Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2004; 66(6): 1635 - 1642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Namkung and D. R. Sibley
Protein Kinase C Mediates Phosphorylation, Desensitization, and Trafficking of the D2 Dopamine Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., November 19, 2004; 279(47): 49533 - 49541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Liang, S. Austin, Q. Hoang, and P. H. Fishman
Resistance of the Human {beta}1-Adrenergic Receptor to Agonist-mediated Down-regulation: ROLE OF THE C TERMINUS IN DETERMINING {beta}-SUBTYPE DEGRADATION
J. Biol. Chem., October 10, 2003; 278(41): 39773 - 39781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
J. Duan, M. S. Wainwright, J. M. Comeron, N. Saitou, A. R. Sanders, J. Gelernter, and P. V. Gejman
Synonymous mutations in the human dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) affect mRNA stability and synthesis of the receptor
Hum. Mol. Genet., February 1, 2003; 12(3): 205 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
P. A. Zaki, D. E. Keith Jr., J. B. Thomas, F. I. Carroll, and C. J. Evans
Agonist-, Antagonist-, and Inverse Agonist-Regulated Trafficking of the delta -Opioid Receptor Correlates with, but Does Not Require, G Protein Activation
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2001; 298(3): 1015 - 1020.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Hukovic, M. Rocheville, U. Kumar, R. Sasi, S. Khare, and Y. C. Patel
Agonist-dependent Up-regulation of Human Somatostatin Receptor Type 1 Requires Molecular Signals in the Cytoplasmic C-tail
J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 1999; 274(35): 24550 - 24558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J. A. Schetz, A. Chu, and D. R. Sibley
Zinc Modulates Antagonist Interactions with D2-Like Dopamine Receptors through Distinct Molecular Mechanisms
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 1999; 289(2): 956 - 964.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
C. MISSALE, S. R. NASH, S. W. ROBINSON, M. JABER, and M. G. CARON
Dopamine Receptors: From Structure to Function
Physiol Rev, January 1, 1998; 78(1): 189 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Y. K. Ng, G. Varghese, H. T. Chung, J. Trogadis, P. Seeman, B. F. O'Dowd, and S. R. George
Resistance of the Dopamine D2L Receptor to Desensitization Accompanies the Up-Regulation of Receptors on to the Surface of Sf9 Cells
Endocrinology, October 1, 1997; 138(10): 4199 - 4206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
D. S. Cowen, P. B. Molinoff, and D. R. Manning
5-Hydroxytryptamine1A Receptor-Mediated Increases in Receptor Expression and Activation of Nuclear Factor-kappa B in Transfected Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 1997; 52(2): 221 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. J. Smit, E. Roovers, H. Timmerman, Y. van de Vrede, A. E. Alewijnse, and R. Leurs
Two Distinct Pathways for Histamine H(2) Receptor Down-regulation
J. Biol. Chem., March 29, 1996; 271(13): 7574 - 7582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. S. Fishburn, Z. Elazar, and S. Fuchs
Differential Glycosylation and Intracellular Trafficking for the Long and Short Isoforms of the D(2) Dopamine Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., December 15, 1995; 270(50): 29819 - 29824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics