MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Houssami, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sexton, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Houssami, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sexton, P. M.

Divergent structural requirements exist for calcitonin receptor binding specificity and adenylate cyclase activation

S Houssami, DM Findlay, CL Brady, TJ Martin, RM Epand, EE Moore, E Murayama, T Tamura, RC Orlowski and PM Sexton

St. Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.

The basis of the high potency of salmon calcitonin (sCT) in radioligand binding competition and cAMP accumulation studies with cloned calcitonin (CT) receptors from rats, pigs, and humans was examined using two sets of CT analogues, i.e., chimeric sCT/human CT (hCT) analogues and analogues of sCT with differing capacities to form an amphipathic alpha-helix. In competition for 125I-sCT binding the following relative specificities were observed for the chimeric peptides: rat C1a CT receptor, sCT > or = (1-16)hCT/(17-32)sCT (ACT-15) > (1-16)sCT/(17-32)hCT (ACT-27); rat C1b CT receptor, sCT >> ACT-15 > ACT-27; hCT receptor, sCT = ACT-15 > ACT-27; porcine CT receptor, sCT > ACT-27 > ACT-15. In contrast, in ligand-induced cAMP accumulation studies the relative efficacies were as follows: rat C1a CT receptor, sCT = ACT-15 > ACT-27; rat C1b CT receptor, sCT = ACT-15 > ACT-27; hCT receptor, sCT = ACT-15 > or = to ACT-27; porcine CT receptor, sCT = ACT- 15 = ACT-27. The data demonstrate that residues present in the carboxyl- terminal half of sCT are more important for binding competition with the rat C1a, rat C1b, and human CT receptors, whereas residues in the amino-terminal half of sCT are more important for binding competition with the porcine CT receptor. Carboxyl-terminal sCT residues are also important for full potency in adenylate cyclase activation with the rat C1a and rat C1b CT receptors but are less important for activation via the hCT receptor. The disparity in the relative potencies of the peptides in studies of binding competition and cAMP accumulation is suggestive of significant differences in the relative affinities of the peptides for active and inactive conformations of the CT receptor. The use of sCT analogues with varying capacities to form alpha-helices also revealed divergence in the responses of different receptors. This was most apparent for the stimulation of cAMP production by the rat receptor isoforms C1a and C1b. In cells expressing the C1a receptor, the helical analogues sCT and des-Ser2-sCT were equipotent with [Gly8]- des-Leu19-sCT and des-1-amino-[Ala1,7,Gly8]-des-Leu19 sCT, analogues that have reduced or absent helical structure, respectively. In contrast, the nonhelical analogues were 100-1000-fold less potent than sCT and des-Ser2-sCT at the C1b receptor. In general, reduction in the ability of sCT analogues to form helix structures had a greater impact on the potency of the analogues in competition for 125I-sCT binding than in cAMP accumulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Volume 47, Issue 4, pp. 798-809, 04/01/1995
Copyright © 1995 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Andreotti, B. L. Mendez, P. Amodeo, M. A. C. Morelli, H. Nakamuta, and A. Motta
Structural Determinants of Salmon Calcitonin Bioactivity: THE ROLE OF THE LEU-BASED AMPHIPATHIC {alpha}-HELIX
J. Biol. Chem., August 25, 2006; 281(34): 24193 - 24203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. Thomas, S. Chigurupati, M. Anbalagan, and G. Shah
Calcitonin Increases Tumorigenicity of Prostate Cancer Cells: Evidence for the Role of Protein Kinase A and Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 20(8): 1894 - 1911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. J. Rashid, B. F. O'Dowd, and S. R. George
Minireview: Diversity and Complexity of Signaling through Peptidergic G Protein-Coupled Receptors
Endocrinology, June 1, 2004; 145(6): 2645 - 2652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. Pham, J. D. Wade, B. W. Purdue, and P. M. Sexton
Spatial Proximity between a Photolabile Residue in Position 19 of Salmon Calcitonin and the Amino Terminus of the Human Calcitonin Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., February 20, 2004; 279(8): 6720 - 6729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Seck, R. Baron, and W. C. Horne
The Alternatively Spliced {Delta}e13 Transcript of the Rabbit Calcitonin Receptor Dimerizes with the C1a Isoform and Inhibits Its Surface Expression
J. Biol. Chem., June 13, 2003; 278(25): 23085 - 23093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
D. R. Poyner, P. M. Sexton, I. Marshall, D. M. Smith, R. Quirion, W. Born, R. Muff, J. A. Fischer, and S. M. Foord
International Union of Pharmacology. XXXII. The Mammalian Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptides, Adrenomedullin, Amylin, and Calcitonin Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2002; 54(2): 233 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
A. Evdokiou, L.-J. Raggatt, G. J. Atkins, and D. M. Findlay
Calcitonin Receptor-Mediated Growth Suppression of HEK-293 Cells Is Accompanied by Induction of p21WAF1/CIP1 and G2/M Arrest
Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 1999; 13(10): 1738 - 1750.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
G. Christopoulos, K. J. Perry, M. Morfis, N. Tilakaratne, Y. Gao, N. J. Fraser, M. J. Main, S. M. Foord, and P. M. Sexton
Multiple Amylin Receptors Arise from Receptor Activity-Modifying Protein Interaction with the Calcitonin Receptor Gene Product
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 1999; 56(1): 235 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
G. Pozvek, J. M. Hilton, M. Quiza, S. Houssami, and P. M. Sexton
Structure/Function Relationships of Calcitonin Analogues as Agonists, Antagonists, or Inverse Agonists in a Constitutively Activated Receptor Cell System
Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 1997; 51(4): 658 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. J. Deftos, MD
Editorial: There's Something Fishy and Perhaps Even Fowl about the Mammalian Calcitonin Receptor and Its Ligand
Endocrinology, February 1, 1997; 138(2): 519 - 520.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Quiza, M. Dowton, K. J. Perry, and P. M. Sexton
Electrophoretic Mobility and Glycosylation Characteristics of Heterogeneously Expressed Calcitonin Receptors
Endocrinology, February 1, 1997; 138(2): 530 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Bergwitz, T. J. Gardella, M. R. Flannery, J. T. Potts Jr., H. M. Kronenberg, S. R. Goldring, and H. Juppner
Full Activation of Chimeric Receptors by Hybrids between Parathyroid Hormone and Calcitonin. EVIDENCE FOR A COMMON PATTERN OF LIGAND-RECEPTOR INTERACTION
J. Biol. Chem., October 25, 1996; 271(43): 26469 - 26472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics