MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rehberg, B.
Right arrow Articles by Duch, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rehberg, B.
Right arrow Articles by Duch, D. S.

Voltage- and frequency-dependent pentobarbital suppression of brain and muscle sodium channels expressed in a mammalian cell line

B Rehberg, E Bennett, YH Xiao, SR Levinson and DS Duch

Department of Anesthesiology, Cornell University Medical College, New York, New York 10021, USA.

The voltage- and frequency-dependent interactions of pentobarbital with voltage-gated sodium channels were examined in whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. Using rat brain IIA and rat muscle rSkM1 sodium channels expressed in stably transfected Chinese hamster ovary cell lines, it was found that pentobarbital reduced peak inward sodium currents with IC50 values of 1.2 mM (brain) and 1.0 mM (muscle). Analysis of steady state channel availability curves revealed two distinct effects of pentobarbital on both channel isoforms, i.e., a voltage-independent current reduction and an additional hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage dependence of channel availability. The latter effect leads to a voltage dependence of pentobarbital potency. Pentobarbital was also found to slow channel recovery after depolarization, yielding an additional use-dependent component of current suppression. Use- dependent block was enhanced by higher stimulation frequencies, longer pulse durations, and more depolarized holding and pulse potentials. All effects were identical for both channels. These findings can be explained in terms of the modulated receptor hypothesis and are consistent with a preferential interaction of pentobarbital with the inactivated channel state. As a consequence, actual pentobarbital potency would depend largely on experimental conditions or, in vivo, on the physiological parameters of a particular cell.

Volume 48, Issue 1, pp. 89-97, 07/01/1995
Copyright © 1995 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JGPHome page
J. A. Lundbaek
Lipid Bilayer-mediated Regulation of Ion Channel Function by Amphiphilic Drugs
J. Gen. Physiol., May 1, 2008; 131(5): 421 - 429.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. A. Lundbaek, P. Birn, S. E. Tape, G. E. S. Toombes, R. Sogaard, R. E. Koeppe II, S. M. Gruner, A. J. Hansen, and O. S. Andersen
Capsaicin Regulates Voltage-Dependent Sodium Channels by Altering Lipid Bilayer Elasticity
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2005; 68(3): 680 - 689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. Lingamaneni and H. C. Hemmings Jr
Differential interaction of anaesthetics and antiepileptic drugs with neuronal Na+ channels, Ca2+ channels, and GABAA receptors
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2003; 90(2): 199 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
B. W. Urban
Current assessment of targets and theories of anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2002; 89(1): 167 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics