![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
H Zhong, SW Guerrero, TA Esbenshade and KP Minneman
Department of Pharmacology, Emory University Medical School, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
We examined the role of beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptor (AR) density and ratio in catecholamine-stimulated cAMP responses in rat C6 glioma cells. These cells, which normally express both subtypes, were stably transfected with an isopropylthio-beta-D-galactoside-inducible vector containing either beta 1AR or beta 2AR coding sequences, and receptor expression was controlled by the time and concentration of isopropylthio-beta-D-galactoside exposure. Induction of the dominant beta 1AR subtype increased the potencies of isoproterenol (ISO) and other agonists in stimulating cAMP accumulation by 20-40-fold without changing maximal response. Induction of beta 2AR expression caused 7-13- fold increases in the potency of ISO, epinephrine, and zinterol, but not of norepinephrine, and a 20-40% loss in maximal response to all agonists. Selective antagonists showed that both subtypes contributed in a nonadditive manner in the response to ISO under different conditions. After beta 2AR induction, the effects of ISO were not blocked by the beta 1-selective antagonist CGP 20712A but were shifted 100-fold to the right by the beta 2-selective antagonist ICI 118,551. However, in the presence of ICI 118,551, CGP 20712A caused an additional 100-fold decrease in ISO potency, and Schild analysis revealed complex interactions between the two subtypes. Each antagonist alone caused smaller shifts to the right in the dose-response curve to NE and, when present simultaneously, completely abolished the NE response. We conclude that beta 1ARs and beta 2ARs have different efficiencies in activating cAMP accumulation in C6 glioma cells. Activation of coexisting subtypes results in complex and sometimes synergistic interactions between the two subtypes, which vary with agonist concentration, selectivity, subtype density, and ratio.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. R. Braden, J. C. Parrish, J. C. Naylor, and D. E. Nichols Molecular Interaction of Serotonin 5-HT2A Receptor Residues Phe339(6.51) and Phe340(6.52) with Superpotent N-Benzyl Phenethylamine Agonists Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2006; 70(6): 1956 - 1964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W.-Z. Zhu, K. Chakir, S. Zhang, D. Yang, C. Lavoie, M. Bouvier, T. E. Hebert, E. G. Lakatta, H. Cheng, and R.-P. Xiao Heterodimerization of {beta}1- and {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor Subtypes Optimizes {beta}-Adrenergic Modulation of Cardiac Contractility Circ. Res., August 5, 2005; 97(3): 244 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Barki-Harrington, C. Perrino, and H. A Rockman Network integration of the adrenergic system in cardiac hypertrophy Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2004; 63(3): 391 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. E. Mills, M. E. Spurlock, and D. J. Smith {beta}-Adrenergic receptor subtypes that mediate ractopaminestimulation of lipolysis J Anim Sci, March 1, 2003; 81(3): 662 - 668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Simon, A. K. Filippov, S. Goransson, Y. H. Wong, C. Frelin, A. D. Michel, D. A. Brown, and E. A. Barnard Characterization and Channel Coupling of the P2Y12 Nucleotide Receptor of Brain Capillary Endothelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., August 23, 2002; 277(35): 31390 - 31400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Claeysen, M. Sebben, C. Bécamel, R. M. Eglen, R. D. Clark, J. Bockaert, and A. Dumuis Pharmacological Properties of 5-Hydroxytryptamine4 Receptor Antagonists on Constitutively Active Wild-Type and Mutated Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2000; 58(1): 136 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. R. Miller, D. G. Witte, L. M. Ireland, C. H. Kang, J. M. Roch, J. N. Masters, T. A. Esbenshade, and A. A. Hancock Analysis of Apparent Noncompetitive Responses to Competitive H1-Histamine Receptor Antagonists in Fluorescent Imaging Plate Reader-Based Calcium Assays J Biomol Screen, October 1, 1999; 4(5): 249 - 258. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. W. Guerrero and K. P. Minneman Coupling Efficiencies of beta 1- and beta 2-Adrenergic Receptors Expressed Alone or Together in Transfected GH3 Pituitary Cells J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 1999; 290(3): 980 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y.-Y. Zhou, H. Cheng, L.-S. Song, D. Wang, E. G. Lakatta, and R.-P. Xiao Spontaneous beta 2-Adrenergic Signaling Fails To Modulate L-Type Ca2+ Current in Mouse Ventricular Myocytes Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 1999; 56(3): 485 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.-J. Zhang, H. Cheng, Y.-Y. Zhou, D.-J. Wang, W. Zhu, B. Ziman, H. Spurgoen, R. J. Lefkowitz, E. G. Lakatta, W. J. Koch, et al. Inhibition of Spontaneous beta 2-Adrenergic Activation Rescues beta 1-Adrenergic Contractile Response in Cardiomyocytes Overexpressing beta 2-Adrenoceptor J. Biol. Chem., July 7, 2000; 275(28): 21773 - 21779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
