MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hjorth, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hjorth, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, T. W.

Radioligand-dependent discrepancy in agonist affinities enhanced by mutations in the kappa-opioid receptor

SA Hjorth, K Thirstrup and TW Schwartz

Laboratory for Molecular Pharmacology 6321, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. siv@molpharm.dk

A series of kappa/mu receptor chimeras and a number of kappa receptors substituted in the second transmembrane segment (TM-II) were investigated using as radioligands, respectively, the kappa-selective agonist [3H]C1977 and the nonselective opioid antagonist [3H]diprenorphine (DIP). All of the receptor constructs bound [3H]DIP with similar and high affinity, whereas the apparent affinity of the nonpeptide agonist C1977, when estimated in competition binding with the antagonist [3H]DIP, was impaired between 42- and > 500-fold in the kappa/mu chimeras and between 64- and 153-fold in three of the kappa receptor mutants that had been substituted in the TM-II segment. However, homologous competition binding experiments, using [3H]C1977 as radioligand, showed that the high affinity binding of this nonpeptide agonist was in fact not impaired in four of the kappa/mu chimeras and in three TM-II substituted kappa receptors compared with the wild-type kappa receptor. In all cases in which mutations decreased the apparent affinity of C1977 without affecting its actual affinity, as determined in homologous assays using [3H]C1977, the calculated number of receptor sites (Bmax) was decreased. In three of the kappa/mu constructs, binding of [3H]C1977 was undetectable, indicating that in these chimeras the affinity of the nonpeptide agonist had actually been affected. Also, for the kappa-selective peptide agonist dynorphin A(1- 8), the measured affinity for the receptor mutants was strongly dependent on whether it was determined using the antagonist [3H]DIP or the agonist [3H]C1977 in that < or = 800-fold higher Ki values were determined in competition with the antagonist. It is concluded that mutations in the kappa-opioid receptor can cause large discrepancies between the affinity determined for agonists in homologous versus heterologous competition binding assays and that this pattern, which is compatible with a partial uncoupling of receptors, is observed in surprisingly many types of receptor mutations.

Volume 50, Issue 4, pp. 977-984, 10/01/1996
Copyright © 1996 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. M. Rosenkilde, R. David, I. Oerlecke, T. Benned-Jensen, U. Geumann, A. G. Beck-Sickinger, and T. W. Schwartz
Conformational Constraining of Inactive and Active States of a Seven Transmembrane Receptor by Metal Ion Site Engineering in the Extracellular End of Transmembrane Segment V
Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2006; 70(6): 1892 - 1901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
D. Ott, R. Frischknecht, and A. Pluckthun
Construction and characterization of a kappa opioid receptor devoid of all free cysteines
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., January 1, 2004; 17(1): 37 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
G. Pineyro, M. Azzi, A. De Lean, P. Schiller, and M. Bouvier
Short-Term Inverse-Agonist Treatment Induces Reciprocal Changes in delta -Opioid Agonist and Inverse-Agonist Binding Capacity
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2001; 60(4): 816 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
Y. Lin, X. Jian, Z. Lin, G. S. Kroog, S. Mantey, R. T. Jensen, J. Battey, and J. Northup
Two Amino Acids in the Sixth Transmembrane Segment of the Mouse Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Are Important for Receptor Activation
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2000; 294(3): 1053 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. M. Rosenkilde and T. W. Schwartz
Potency of Ligands Correlates with Affinity Measured against Agonist and Inverse Agonists but Not against Neutral Ligand in Constitutively Active Chemokine Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2000; 57(3): 602 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
U. Gether
Uncovering Molecular Mechanisms Involved in Activation of G Protein-Coupled Receptors
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2000; 21(1): 90 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. M. Rosenkilde, T. N. Kledal, H. Brauner-Osborne, and T. W. Schwartz
Agonists and Inverse Agonists for the Herpesvirus 8-encoded Constitutively Active Seven-transmembrane Oncogene Product, ORF-74
J. Biol. Chem., January 8, 1999; 274(2): 956 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Massotte, L. Baroche, F. Simonin, L. Yu, B. Kieffer, and F. Pattus
Characterization of delta , kappa , and µ Human Opioid Receptors Overexpressed in Baculovirus-infected Insect Cells
J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 1997; 272(32): 19987 - 19992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics