|
|
|
|
Center for Basic Research in Digestive Diseases and the Department
of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation,
Rochester, Minnesota 55905
Receptor phosphorylation has been implicated in desensitization
responses to some agonist ligands, in which receptors may become
uncoupled from G proteins and move into cellular compartments inaccessible to hydrophilic ligands. Understanding of the linkage between these processes, however, has come largely from recombinant receptor-bearing cell systems with consensus sites of kinase action mutagenized. We recently established methodology permitting direct assessment of sites of phosphorylation of the cholecystokinin receptor
(CCKR) in its native milieu in the pancreatic acinar cell and in a
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-CCKR cell line (1, 2). Although CCK
binding leads to phosphorylation of serine residues within the third
intracellular loop of the receptor in both cell types, there are clear
differences in the time course of phosphorylation, in the balance of
action of kinases and a receptor phosphatase, and in a few of the
distinct sites phosphorylated. In this work, we have directly assessed
the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate responses to CCK and desensitization of
these responses in both cells. CHO cell lines expressing receptor
mutants with protein kinase C consensus sites modified were also
studied. CCK-stimulated inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate responses in both
cells expressing wild-type receptors were rapidly and completely
desensitized, associated with the onset of receptor phosphorylation.
However, despite maintenance of the phosphorylated state of the
receptor in the CHO-CCKR cell and its dephosphorylation returning the
receptor to its basal state in the acinar cell, desensitization
continued to be present in both. Mutagenesis of Ser260 and Ser264 to
alanines individually reduced receptor phosphorylation by approximately
50%, whereas the dual mutant completely eliminated agonist-stimulated
phosphorylation. Because other sites of phosphorylation were still
intact in this construct, this raises the possibility of hierarchical
phosphorylation with these two sites key in making other sites
accessible to kinases. Constructs modifying Ser264 delayed the onset of
desensitization, whereas all constructs proceeded to achieve complete
desensitization by 10 min. Receptor internalization occurred
independent of its phosphorylation state in the CHO cell lines,
explaining the desensitization observed. In the acinar cell in which
the receptor remains on the cell surface after agonist occupation, we
postulate that receptor insulation achieves similar uncoupling from G
protein association as is achieved by receptor phosphorylation early
after agonist occupation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Torrecilla, E. J. Spragg, B. Poulin, P. J. McWilliams, S. C. Mistry, A. Blaukat, and A. B. Tobin Phosphorylation and regulation of a G protein-coupled receptor by protein kinase CK2 J. Cell Biol., April 9, 2007; 177(1): 127 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Langlet, I. Langer, P. Vertongen, N. Gaspard, J.-M. Vanderwinden, and P. Robberecht Contribution of the Carboxyl Terminus of the VPAC1 Receptor to Agonist-induced Receptor Phosphorylation, Internalization, and Recycling J. Biol. Chem., July 29, 2005; 280(30): 28034 - 28043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. Harikumar, V. Puri, R. D. Singh, K. Hanada, R. E. Pagano, and L. J. Miller Differential Effects of Modification of Membrane Cholesterol and Sphingolipids on the Conformation, Function, and Trafficking of the G Protein-coupled Cholecystokinin Receptor J. Biol. Chem., January 21, 2005; 280(3): 2176 - 2185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. Harikumar, D. I. Pinon, W. S. Wessels, E. S. Dawson, T. P. Lybrand, F. G. Prendergast, and L. J. Miller Measurement of Intermolecular Distances for the Natural Agonist Peptide Docked at the Cholecystokinin Receptor Expressed in Situ Using Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2004; 65(1): 28 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. W. Tawfeek, F. Qian, and A. B. Abou-Samra Phosphorylation of the Receptor for PTH and PTHrP Is Required for Internalization and Regulates Receptor Signaling Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2002; 16(1): 1 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-Q. Ding, R. V. Rao, S. M. Kuntz, E. L. Holicky, and L. J. Miller Impaired Resensitization and Recycling of the Cholecystokinin Receptor by Co-expression of its Second Intracellular Loop Mol. Pharmacol., April 13, 2001; 58(6): 1424 - 1433. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Covasa, J. K. Marcuson, and R. C. Ritter Diminished satiation in rats exposed to elevated levels of endogenous or exogenous cholecystokinin Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2001; 280(2): R331 - R337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. V. Rao, E. L. Holicky, S. M. Kuntz, and L. J. Miller CCK receptor phosphorylation exposes regulatory domains affecting phosphorylation and receptor trafficking Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2000; 279(6): C1986 - C1992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Noble, S. A. Wank, J. N. Crawley, J. Bradwejn, K. B. Seroogy, M. Hamon, and B. P. Roques International Union of Pharmacology. XXI. Structure, Distribution, and Functions of Cholecystokinin Receptors Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 1999; 51(4): 745 - 781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pizard, A. Blaukat, W. Muller-Esterl, F. Alhenc-Gelas, and R. M. Rajerison Bradykinin-induced Internalization of the Human B2 Receptor Requires Phosphorylation of Three Serine and Two Threonine Residues at Its Carboxyl Tail J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 1999; 274(18): 12738 - 12747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. del Valle CCK receptor trafficking: a novel paradigm of travel. Focus on "Regulation of lateral mobility and cellular trafficking of the CCK receptor by a partial agonist" Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 1999; 276(3): C537 - C538. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. F. Roettger, D. I. Pinon, T. P. Burghardt, and L. J. Miller Regulation of lateral mobility and cellular trafficking of the CCK receptor by a partial agonist Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 1999; 276(3): C539 - C547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Portier, M. Rinaldi-Carmona, F. Pecceu, T. Combes, C. Poinot-Chazel, B. Calandra, F. Barth, G. L. Fur, and P. Casellas SR 144528, an Antagonist for the Peripheral Cannabinoid Receptor that Behaves as an Inverse Agonist J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 1999; 288(2): 582 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
V. Beaumont, M. B. Hepworth, J. S. Luty, E. Kelly, and G. Henderson Somatostatin Receptor Desensitization in NG108-15 Cells. A CONSEQUENCE OF RECEPTOR SEQUESTRATION J. Biol. Chem., December 11, 1998; 273(50): 33174 - 33183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Saura, J. Mallol, E. I. Canela, C. Lluis, and R. Franco Adenosine Deaminase and A1 Adenosine Receptors Internalize Together following Agonist-induced Receptor Desensitization J. Biol. Chem., July 10, 1998; 273(28): 17610 - 17617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Y. Go, E. L. Holicky, E. M. Hadac, R. V. Rao, and L. J. Miller Identification of a domain in the carboxy terminus of CCK receptor that affects its intracellular trafficking Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, July 1, 1998; 275(1): G56 - G62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Yu and P. M. Hinkle Signal Transduction, Desensitization, and Recovery of Responses to Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone after Inhibition of Receptor Internalization Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 1998; 12(5): 737 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Wank I. CCK receptors: an exemplary family Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, April 1, 1998; 274(4): G607 - G613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Backstrom, R. D. Price, D. T. Reasoner, and E. Sanders-Bush Deletion of the Serotonin 5-HT2C Receptor PDZ Recognition Motif Prevents Receptor Phosphorylation and Delays Resensitization of Receptor Responses J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 2000; 275(31): 23620 - 23626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||