MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenwood, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, Y. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenwood, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Patel, Y. C.

Molecular Pharmacology, Volume 52, Issue 5, 807-814

Ligand Binding Pocket of the Human Somatostatin Receptor 5: Mutational Analysis of the Extracellular Domains

Michael T. Greenwood, Nedim Hukovic, Ujendra Kumar, Rosemarie Panetta, Siv A. Hjorth, Coimbatore B. Srikant, and Yogesh C. Patel

Fraser Laboratories, Departments of Medicine and Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Royal Victoria Hospital, and the Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A1, Canada (M.T.G., N.H., U.K., R.P., C.B.S., Y.C.P.), and Laboratory for Molecular Pharmacology, The Laboratory Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark (S.A.H.)

The ligand binding domain of G protein-coupled receptors for peptide ligands consists of a pocket formed by extracellular and transmembrane domain (TM) residues. In the case of somatostatin (SRIF), however, previous studies have suggested that the binding cavity of the octapeptide analog SMS201-995 (SMS) is lined by residues in TMs III-VII. The additional involvement of the extracellular domains for binding SMS or the natural SRIF ligands (SRIF-14, SRIF-28) has not been clarified. Using a cassette construct cDNA for the human somatostatin 5 receptor (sst5R), we systematically examined the role of exofacial structures in ligand binding by creating a series of mutants in which the extracellular portions have been altered by conservative segment exchange (CSE) mutagenesis for the extracellular loops (ECLs) and by deletion (for the NH2-terminal segment) or truncation analysis (ECL3). CHO-K1 cells were stably transfected with wild type or mutant human sst5R constructs, and agonist binding was assessed using membrane binding assays with 125I-LTT SRIF-28 ligand. Deletion of the NH2 terminus or CSE mutagenesis of ECL1 and ECL3 produced minor 2-8-fold decreases in affinity for SRIF-14, SRIF-28, and SMS ligands. Truncation of ECL3 to mimic the size of this loop in sst1R and sst4R (the two subtypes that do not bind SMS) did not interfere with the binding of SMS, SRIF-14, or SRIF-28. In contrast, both ECL2 mutants failed to bind 125I-LTT SRIF-28. Immunocytochemical analysis of nonpermeabilized cells with a human sst5R antibody revealed that the mutant receptors were targeted to the plasma membrane. Labeled SMS (125I-Tyr3 SMS) also failed to bind to the mutant ECL2 receptors. These results suggest a potential contribution of ECL2 (in addition to the previously identified residues in TMs III-VII) to the SRIF ligand binding pocket.


Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
M. A. Sheridan, J. D. Kittilson, and B. J. Slagter
Structure-Function Relationships of the Signaling System for the Somatostatin Peptide Hormone Family
Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2000; 40(2): 269 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Rocheville, D. C. Lange, U. Kumar, R. Sasi, R. C. Patel, and Y. C. Patel
Subtypes of the Somatostatin Receptor Assemble as Functional Homo- and Heterodimers
J. Biol. Chem., March 10, 2000; 275(11): 7862 - 7869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
X. Lin, J. A. Janovick, S. Brothers, P. M. Conn, and R. E. Peter
Molecular Cloning and Expression of Two Type One Somatostatin Receptors in Goldfish Brain
Endocrinology, November 1, 1999; 140(11): 5211 - 5219.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
S. KHARE, U. KUMAR, R. SASI, L. PUEBLA, L. CALDERON, K. LEMSTROM, P. HAYRY, and A. Y. C. PATEL
Differential regulation of somatostatin receptor types 1-5 in rat aorta after angioplasty
FASEB J, February 1, 1999; 13(2): 387 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Hukovic, R. Panetta, U. Kumar, M. Rocheville, and Y. C. Patel
The Cytoplasmic Tail of the Human Somatostatin Receptor Type 5 Is Crucial for Interaction with Adenylyl Cyclase and in Mediating Desensitization and Internalization
J. Biol. Chem., August 14, 1998; 273(33): 21416 - 21422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics