|
|
|
|
Molecular Pharmacology, Volume 52, Issue 5, 807-814
Fraser Laboratories, Departments of Medicine and Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Royal Victoria Hospital, and the Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A1, Canada (M.T.G., N.H., U.K., R.P., C.B.S., Y.C.P.), and Laboratory for Molecular Pharmacology, The Laboratory Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark (S.A.H.)
The ligand binding domain of G protein-coupled receptors for peptide ligands consists of a pocket formed by extracellular and transmembrane domain (TM) residues. In the case of somatostatin (SRIF), however, previous studies have suggested that the binding cavity of the octapeptide analog SMS201-995 (SMS) is lined by residues in TMs III-VII. The additional involvement of the extracellular domains for binding SMS or the natural SRIF ligands (SRIF-14, SRIF-28) has not been clarified. Using a cassette construct cDNA for the human somatostatin 5 receptor (sst5R), we systematically examined the role of exofacial structures in ligand binding by creating a series of mutants in which the extracellular portions have been altered by conservative segment exchange (CSE) mutagenesis for the extracellular loops (ECLs) and by deletion (for the NH2-terminal segment) or truncation analysis (ECL3). CHO-K1 cells were stably transfected with wild type or mutant human sst5R constructs, and agonist binding was assessed using membrane binding assays with 125I-LTT SRIF-28 ligand. Deletion of the NH2 terminus or CSE mutagenesis of ECL1 and ECL3 produced minor 2-8-fold decreases in affinity for SRIF-14, SRIF-28, and SMS ligands. Truncation of ECL3 to mimic the size of this loop in sst1R and sst4R (the two subtypes that do not bind SMS) did not interfere with the binding of SMS, SRIF-14, or SRIF-28. In contrast, both ECL2 mutants failed to bind 125I-LTT SRIF-28. Immunocytochemical analysis of nonpermeabilized cells with a human sst5R antibody revealed that the mutant receptors were targeted to the plasma membrane. Labeled SMS (125I-Tyr3 SMS) also failed to bind to the mutant ECL2 receptors. These results suggest a potential contribution of ECL2 (in addition to the previously identified residues in TMs III-VII) to the SRIF ligand binding pocket.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Sheridan, J. D. Kittilson, and B. J. Slagter Structure-Function Relationships of the Signaling System for the Somatostatin Peptide Hormone Family Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2000; 40(2): 269 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rocheville, D. C. Lange, U. Kumar, R. Sasi, R. C. Patel, and Y. C. Patel Subtypes of the Somatostatin Receptor Assemble as Functional Homo- and Heterodimers J. Biol. Chem., March 10, 2000; 275(11): 7862 - 7869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Lin, J. A. Janovick, S. Brothers, P. M. Conn, and R. E. Peter Molecular Cloning and Expression of Two Type One Somatostatin Receptors in Goldfish Brain Endocrinology, November 1, 1999; 140(11): 5211 - 5219. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. KHARE, U. KUMAR, R. SASI, L. PUEBLA, L. CALDERON, K. LEMSTROM, P. HAYRY, and A. Y. C. PATEL Differential regulation of somatostatin receptor types 1-5 in rat aorta after angioplasty FASEB J, February 1, 1999; 13(2): 387 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hukovic, R. Panetta, U. Kumar, M. Rocheville, and Y. C. Patel The Cytoplasmic Tail of the Human Somatostatin Receptor Type 5 Is Crucial for Interaction with Adenylyl Cyclase and in Mediating Desensitization and Internalization J. Biol. Chem., August 14, 1998; 273(33): 21416 - 21422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||