![]() |
|
|
Vol. 53, Issue 1, 166-175, January 1998
Laboratory for Molecular Pharmacology (B.H., S.Z., C.E.E., S.A.H.,
T.W.S.), Pharmacological Institute, University of Copenhagen,
Rigshospitalet 6321, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark, and
Department of
Protein Chemistry, Institute of Molecular Biology (T.W.S.), University
of Copenhagen, DK-1353, Copenhagen, Denmark
Residues in transmembrane domain (TM)-III, TM-V, TM-VI, and TM-VII
believed to be facing the deep part of the presumed main ligand-binding
pocket of the NK1 receptor were probed by alanine substitution and introduction of residues with larger and/or chemically distinct side chains. Unaltered or even improved binding affinity for
four peptide agonists, substance P, substance P-O-methyl
ester, eledoisin, and neurokinin A, as well as normal EC50
values for substance P in stimulating phosphatidylinositol turnover
indicated that these mutations did not alter the overall functional
integrity of the receptor. The alanine substitutions in general had
only minor effects on nonpeptide antagonist binding. However, the
introduction of the larger and polar aspartic acid and histidine
residues at positions corresponding to the monoamine binding aspartic
acid in TM-III of the
2-adrenoceptor (ProIII:08, Pro112
in the NK1 receptor) and to the presumed monoamine
interacting "two serines" in TM-V (ThrV:09, Thr201; and IleV:12,
Ile204) impaired by >100-fold the binding of a group of nonpeptide
antagonists, including CP96,345, CP99,994, RP67,580, RPR100,893, and
CAM4092. In contrast, another group of nonpeptide antagonists,
LY303,870, FK888, and SR140,333, were little or not at all affected by
the space-filling substitutions. Two of these compounds, FK888 and
LY303,870, were those most seriously affected (75-89-fold) by alanine
substitution of PheVI:20 located in the upper part of the main
ligand-binding crevice. Surprisingly, substitution of AlaIII:11
(Ala115), which is located in the middle of TM-III, conceivably
pointing toward TM-VII, with a larger valine residue increased the
affinity for all 13 ligands tested, presumably by creating a closer
interhelical packing. It is concluded that the introduction of larger
side chains at positions at which molecular models indicate that this
is structurally allowed can be a powerful method of locating
ligand-binding sites due to the considerable difference between
positive and negative results. Such steric hindrance mutagenesis
strongly indicates that one population of nonpeptide antagonists bind
in the deep pocket of the main ligand-binding crevice of the
NK1 receptor, whereas another group of nonpeptide antagonists, especially SR140,333, was surprisingly resistant to
mutational mapping in this pocket.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. M. Rosenkilde, L.-O. Gerlach, S. Hatse, R. T. Skerlj, D. Schols, G. J. Bridger, and T. W. Schwartz Molecular Mechanism of Action of Monocyclam Versus Bicyclam Non-peptide Antagonists in the CXCR4 Chemokine Receptor J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2007; 282(37): 27354 - 27365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Holst, J. Mokrosinski, M. Lang, E. Brandt, R. Nygaard, T. M. Frimurer, A. G. Beck-Sickinger, and T. W. Schwartz Identification of an Efficacy Switch Region in the Ghrelin Receptor Responsible for Interchange between Agonism and Inverse Agonism J. Biol. Chem., May 25, 2007; 282(21): 15799 - 15811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Rosenkilde, M. B. Andersen, R. Nygaard, T. M. Frimurer, and T. W. Schwartz Activation of the CXCR3 Chemokine Receptor through Anchoring of a Small Molecule Chelator Ligand between TM-III, -IV, and -VI Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2007; 71(3): 930 - 941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Holst, K. L. Egerod, E. Schild, S. P. Vickers, S. Cheetham, L.-O. Gerlach, L. Storjohann, C. E. Stidsen, R. Jones, A. G. Beck-Sickinger, et al. GPR39 Signaling Is Stimulated by Zinc Ions But Not by Obestatin Endocrinology, January 1, 2007; 148(1): 13 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Holst, M. Lang, E. Brandt, A. Bach, A. Howard, T. M. Frimurer, A. Beck-Sickinger, and T. W. Schwartz Ghrelin Receptor Inverse Agonists: Identification of an Active Peptide Core and Its Interaction Epitopes on the Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2006; 70(3): 936 - 946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Holst, E. Brandt, A. Bach, A. Heding, and T. W. Schwartz Nonpeptide and Peptide Growth Hormone Secretagogues Act Both as Ghrelin Receptor Agonist and as Positive or Negative Allosteric Modulators of Ghrelin Signaling Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2005; 19(9): 2400 - 2411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Jorgensen, L. Martini, T. W. Schwartz, and C. E. Elling Characterization of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor {beta}-Arrestin 2 Interaction: A High-Affinity Receptor Phenotype Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2005; 19(3): 812 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Holst, N. D. Holliday, A. Bach, C. E. Elling, H. M. Cox, and T. W. Schwartz Common Structural Basis for Constitutive Activity of the Ghrelin Receptor Family J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 2004; 279(51): 53806 - 53817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Vrecl, R. Jorgensen, A. Pogacnik, and A. Heding Development of a BRET2 Screening Assay Using {beta}-Arrestin 2 Mutants J Biomol Screen, June 1, 2004; 9(4): 322 - 333. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Rosenkilde, L.-O. Gerlach, J. S. Jakobsen, R. T. Skerlj, G. J. Bridger, and T. W. Schwartz Molecular Mechanism of AMD3100 Antagonism in the CXCR4 Receptor: TRANSFER OF BINDING SITE TO THE CXCR3 RECEPTOR J. Biol. Chem., January 23, 2004; 279(4): 3033 - 3041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Granas, J. Ferrer, C. J. Loland, J. A. Javitch, and U. Gether N-terminal Truncation of the Dopamine Transporter Abolishes Phorbol Ester- and Substance P Receptor-stimulated Phosphorylation without Impairing Transporter Internalization J. Biol. Chem., February 7, 2003; 278(7): 4990 - 5000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Nielsen, L. Z. Nielsen, S. A. Hjorth, M. H. Perrin, and W. W. Vale Constitutive activation of tethered-peptide/ corticotropin-releasing factor receptor chimeras PNAS, August 29, 2000; 97(18): 10277 - 10281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Holst, C. E. Elling, and T. W. Schwartz Partial Agonism through a Zinc-Ion Switch Constructed between Transmembrane Domains III and VII in the Tachykinin NK1 Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2000; 58(2): 263 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
U. Gether Uncovering Molecular Mechanisms Involved in Activation of G Protein-Coupled Receptors Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2000; 21(1): 90 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Isogaya, Y. Sugimoto, R. Tanimura, R. Tanaka, H. Kikkawa, T. Nagao, and H. Kurose Binding Pockets of the beta 1- and beta 2-Adrenergic Receptors for Subtype-Selective Agonists Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 1999; 56(5): 875 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Renzetti, R.-M. Catalioto, M. Criscuoli, P. Cucchi, C. Ferrer, A. Giolitti, M. Guelfi, L. Rotondaro, F. J. Warner, and C. A. Maggi Relevance of Aromatic Residues in Transmembrane Segments V to VII for Binding of Peptide and Nonpeptide Antagonists to the Human Tachykinin NK2 Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 1999; 290(2): 487 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pellegrini, A. A. Bremer, A. L. Ulfers, N. D. Boyd, and D. F. Mierke Molecular Characterization of the Substance P{middle dot}Neurokinin-1 Receptor Complex. DEVELOPMENT OF AN EXPERIMENTALLY BASED MODEL J. Biol. Chem., June 15, 2001; 276(25): 22862 - 22867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||