![]() |
|
|
Vol. 54, Issue 6, 968-978, December 1998
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Mount Sinai School of
Medicine of the City University of New York, New York, New York
10029 (A.-O.C., R.O.), and
Division of Molecular Medicine,
Department of Medicine, Cornell University Medical College and The New
York Hospital, New York, New York 10021 (J.H.P., A.J.-P., D.R.N.,
M.C.G)
We have studied the role of a highly conserved tryptophan and
other aromatic residues of the thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH)
receptor (TRH-R) that are predicted by computer modeling to form a
hydrophobic cluster between transmembrane helix (TM)5 and TM6. The
affinity of a mutant TRH-R, in which Trp279 was substituted by alanine
(W279A TRH-R), for most tested agonists was higher than that of
wild-type (WT) TRH-R, whereas its affinity for inverse agonists was
diminished, suggesting that W279A TRH-R is constitutively active. We
found that W279A TRH-R exhibited 3.9-fold more signaling activity than
WT TRH-R in the absence of agonist. This increased basal activity was
inhibited by the inverse agonist midazolam, confirming that the mutant
receptor is constitutively active. Computer-simulated models of the
unoccupied WT TRH-R, the TRH-occupied WT TRH-R, and various TRH-R
mutants predict that a hydrophobic cluster of residues, including
Trp279 (TM6), Tyr282, and Phe199 (TM5), constrains the receptor in an
inactive conformation. In support of this model, we found that
substitution of Phe199 by alanine or of Tyr282 by alanine or
phenylalanine, but not of Tyr200 (by alanine or phenylalanine),
resulted in a constitutively active receptor. We propose that a
hydrophobic cluster including residues in TM5 and TM6 constrains the
TRH-R in an inactive conformation via interhelical interactions.
Disruption of these constraints by TRH binding or by mutation leads to
changes in the relative positions of TM5 and TM6 and to the formation
of an active form of TRH-R.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-R. Chen, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport Suppression of Thyrotropin Receptor Constitutive Activity by a Monoclonal Antibody with Inverse Agonist Activity Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 2375 - 2382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Foucaud, I. G. Tikhonova, I. Langer, C. Escrieut, M. Dufresne, C. Seva, B. Maigret, and D. Fourmy Partial Agonism, Neutral Antagonism, and Inverse Agonism at the Human Wild-Type and Constitutively Active Cholecystokinin-2 Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2006; 69(3): 680 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Lu, W. Huang, S. Worthington, P. Drabik, R. Osman, and M. C. Gershengorn A Model of Inverse Agonist Action at Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Type 1: Role of a Conserved Tryptophan in Helix 6 Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2004; 66(5): 1192 - 1200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Beukers, J. van Oppenraaij, P. P. W. van der Hoorn, C. C. Blad, H. d. Dulk, J. Brouwer, and A. P. IJzerman Random Mutagenesis of the Human Adenosine A2B Receptor Followed by Growth Selection in Yeast. Identification of Constitutively Active and Gain of Function Mutations Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2004; 65(3): 702 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Govaerts, A. Bondue, J.-Y. Springael, M. Olivella, X. Deupi, E. Le Poul, S. J. Wodak, M. Parmentier, L. Pardo, and C. Blanpain Activation of CCR5 by Chemokines Involves an Aromatic Cluster between Transmembrane Helices 2 and 3 J. Biol. Chem., January 10, 2003; 278(3): 1892 - 1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sun and M. C. Gershengorn Correlation between Basal Signaling and Internalization of Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors: Evidence for Involvement of Similar Receptor Conformations Endocrinology, August 1, 2002; 143(8): 2886 - 2892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Gershengorn and R. Osman Minireview: Insights into G Protein-Coupled Receptor Function Using Molecular Models Endocrinology, January 1, 2001; 142(1): 2 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. H. Song, C.-A. Slowey, D. P. Hurst, and P. H. Reggio The Difference between the CB1 and CB2 Cannabinoid Receptors at Position 5.46 Is Crucial for the Selectivity of WIN55212-2 for CB2 Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 1999; 56(4): 834 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Dube, A. DeCostanzo, and J. B. Konopka Interaction between Transmembrane Domains Five and Six of the alpha -Factor Receptor J. Biol. Chem., August 18, 2000; 275(34): 26492 - 26499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Ho, N. Ganeshalingam, A. Rosenhouse-Dantsker, R. Osman, and M. C. Gershengorn Charged Residues at the Intracellular Boundary of Transmembrane Helices 2 and 3 Independently Affect Constitutive Activity of Kaposi's Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus G Protein-coupled Receptor J. Biol. Chem., January 5, 2001; 276(2): 1376 - 1382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Marie, E. Richard, D. Pruneau, J.-L. Paquet, C. Siatka, R. Larguier, C. Ponce, P. Vassault, T. Groblewski, B. Maigret, et al. Control of Conformational Equilibria in the Human B2 Bradykinin Receptor. MODELING OF NONPEPTIDIC LIGAND ACTION AND COMPARISON TO THE RHODOPSIN STRUCTURE J. Biol. Chem., October 26, 2001; 276(44): 41100 - 41111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||