|
|
|
|
Vol. 58, Issue 1, 185-193, July 2000
-RXR/acoPPRE Complexes between Responsive and
Nonresponsive Species upon Fibrate Administration
Unidad de Farmacología y Farmacognosia (C.R., A.C.,
J.C.L.), and Unidad de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular
(V.N., C.J.C.), Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Barcelona,
Barcelona, Spain
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
(PPAR
) is responsible
for the hypolipidemic, peroxisome proliferation and carcinogenic effects of fibrates. Rats and mice are responsive, but guinea pigs and
primates are resistant to the proliferative and carcinogenic effects of
these drugs, but the hypolipidemic effect is still manifest. It is not
yet clear whether humans should be considered unresponsive, and there
is concern about the long-term safety of fibrates. We present molecular
evidence for the reported resistance of human cells to peroxisome
proliferation by describing a deficient interaction of nuclear extracts
from human cells with an acyl-CoA oxidase (ACO)-peroxisome proliferator
response element probe upon fibrate addition. Electrophoretic
mobility shift assay analysis showed that ciprofibrate elicited a
concentration-dependent increase in the binding of nuclear extracts
from cells of rat (Morris) and human (HepG2) origin to an
ACO-peroxisome proliferator response element probe, although in HepG2
cells the increase was of marginal statistical significance. In Morris
cells, the increase was more marked than in HepG2 cells (4-fold versus
1.5-fold at 0.2 mM ciprofibrate), and maximal binding was achieved
earlier in Morris (30 min) than in HepG2 cells (3 h). Morris cells
responded to the addition of ciprofibrate by increasing the levels of
ACO mRNA, whereas HepG2 did not. The ratio between
PPAR
/PPAR
mRNAs was higher in HepG2 cells than in
Morris cells (3.2 versus 1.9), pointing to an antagonizing effect of
PPAR
on PPAR
activity. These results were obtained in
untransfected cells expressing their own basal set of receptors. We
also provide evidence of the translocation of PPAR
from the cytosol
to the nucleus upon activation by ciprofibrate.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. J. Jiang, B. Lu, F. Y. Xu, J. Gartshore, W. A. Taylor, A. J. Halayko, F. J. Gonzalez, J. Takasaki, P. C. Choy, and G. M. Hatch Stimulation of cardiac cardiolipin biosynthesis by PPAR{alpha} activation J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2004; 45(2): 244 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. X. Yu, J. Odle, and J. K. Drackley Differential induction of peroxisomal beta -oxidation enzymes by clofibric acid and aspirin in piglet tissues Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): R1553 - R1561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. J. Jiang, G. M. Hatch, D. Mymin, T. Dembinski, E. A. Kroeger, and P. C. Choy Modulation of cytosolic phospholipase A2 by PPAR activators in human preadipocytes J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2001; 42(5): 716 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Rodriguez, J. Martinez-Gonzalez, S. Sanchez-Gomez, and L. Badimon LDL Downregulates CYP51 in Porcine Vascular Endothelial Cells and in the Arterial Wall Through a Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein-2-Dependent Mechanism Circ. Res., February 16, 2001; 88(3): 268 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Miller and T. M. Willson Regulation of Xenobiotic Metabolism by Orphan Nuclear Receptors Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2001; 29(1): 3 - 5. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||