![]() |
|
|
Vol. 59, Issue 3, 532-542, March 2001
2A-Adrenergic
Receptor
Departments of Pharmacology (S.M.W., K-L.L., D.J.M., R.R.N.) and
Internal Medicine/Hypertension (R.R.N.), The University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Constitutive activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is now
well recognized and many classical GPCR antagonists have been found to
be inverse agonists. For the
2A-adrenergic receptor (AR)
we determine the relative inverse efficacies of a series of antagonists
and utilize the extended ternary complex model to estimate the fraction
of constitutively active mutant (CAM) receptors in the active state.
Stable Chinese hamster ovary cell lines expressing the porcine
2A-AR in its wild-type (WT) and constitutively activated
(CAM-T373K) form were isolated. Activation of both Gi and
Gs was enhanced for CAM receptors. cAMP production was
suppressed in cells with the CAM
2A-AR and this
suppression was reversed by
2-adrenergic antagonists
with an order of inverse efficacy of rauwolscine > yohimbine > RX821002 > MK912, whereas phentolamine and idazoxan were
essentially neutral antagonists. This striking difference in inverse
efficacy between idazoxan and RX821002 may account for in vivo
pharmacological differences between these two
2-adrenergic antagonists. Agonist binding affinity to
the non-G protein-coupled CAM receptor was 3- to 9-fold higher than to
WT, whereas binding of the most efficacious inverse agonists, yohimbine
and rauwolscine, was 1.7- and 2.1-fold weaker. Analysis of this
difference by the extended ternary complex model indicates that
approximately 50% of the CAM
2A-AR is in the active
(R*) state although there is no detectable constitutive
activity of the WT receptor in the absence of agonist.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Kapur, P. Samaniego, G. A. Thakur, A. Makriyannis, and M. E. Abood Mapping the Structural Requirements in the CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Transmembrane Helix II for Signal Transduction J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2008; 325(1): 341 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Dowling, J. M. Willets, D. C. Budd, S. J. Charlton, S. R. Nahorski, and R. A. J. Challiss A Single Point Mutation (N514Y) in the Human M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Reveals Differences in the Properties of Antagonists: Evidence for Differential Inverse Agonism J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2006; 317(3): 1134 - 1142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Nelson, S. R. Nahorski, and R. A. J. Challiss Constitutive Activity and Inverse Agonism at the M2 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2006; 316(1): 279 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Fitzsimons, F. Monczor, N. Fernandez, C. Shayo, and C. Davio Mepyramine, a Histamine H1 Receptor Inverse Agonist, Binds Preferentially to a G Protein-coupled Form of the Receptor and Sequesters G Protein J. Biol. Chem., August 13, 2004; 279(33): 34431 - 34439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kenakin Efficacy as a Vector: the Relative Prevalence and Paucity of Inverse Agonism Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2004; 65(1): 2 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Takahashi, S. Tokita, and H. Kotani Generation and Characterization of Highly Constitutive Active Histamine H3 Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2003; 307(1): 213 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Pauwels, I. Rauly, and T. Wurch Dissimilar Pharmacological Responses by a New Series of Imidazoline Derivatives at Precoupled and Ligand-Activated {alpha}2A-Adrenoceptor States: Evidence for Effector Pathway-Dependent Differential Antagonism J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2003; 305(3): 1015 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.-P. Xiao {beta}-Adrenergic Signaling in the Heart: Dual Coupling of the {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor to Gs and Gi Proteins Sci. Signal., October 16, 2001; 2001(104): re15 - re15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||