|
|
|
|
Vol. 61, Issue 1, 20-25, January 2002
University of California Los Angeles-Department of Energy
Laboratory of Structural Biology and Molecular Medicine, University of
California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (O.D., I.X.);
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (H.K.); and Department of
Biological Chemistry and the Molecular Biology Institute, University of
California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
(J.C.)
Mammalian phosphodiesterases types 3 and 4 (PDE3 and PDE4) hydrolyze
cAMP and are essential for the regulation of this intracellular second
messenger. These enzymes share structural and biochemical similarities,
but each can be distinguished by its sensitivity to isoenzyme-specific,
substrate-competitive inhibitors. We present a model configuration for
the PDE4 substrate (cAMP) and a PDE4-specific inhibitor (rolipram)
within the active site of the enzyme. The docked models were also used
to examine the structural consequences of mutations that confer
resistance to rolipram and other PDE4-specific inhibitors. The proposed
rolipram-binding configuration is consistent with the
substrate-competitive nature of inhibition and also provides a
structural basis for the observed specificity of binding to the
R- versus S-enantiomer. For mutations
that render the enzyme rolipram-insensitive, there was generally an
inverse relationship between the magnitude of the drug resistance and
the distance of the altered residue from the predicted binding site. We
observed a direct correlation between the net loss of protein residue
interactions (van der Waals contacts and hydrogen bond interactions)
and the degree of rolipram resistance. The positions of several drug
sensitivity-determinant residues define a surface leading to the
substrate- and drug-binding sites, suggesting a possible approach
channel leading to the enzyme active site. The binding of other PDE4
inhibitors (high- and low-affinity) was also modeled and used to
predict the involvement of residues that were not previously implicated
in pharmacological interactions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Navakkode, S. Sajikumar, and J. U. Frey Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Mediated Reinforcement of Hippocampal Early Long-Term Depression by the Type IV-Specific Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor Rolipram and Its Effect on Synaptic Tagging J. Neurosci., November 16, 2005; 25(46): 10664 - 10670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Claveau, S. L. Chen, S. O'Keefe, D. M. Zaller, A. Styhler, S. Liu, Z. Huang, D. W. Nicholson, and J. A. Mancini Preferential Inhibition of T Helper 1, but Not T Helper 2, Cytokines in Vitro by L-826,141 [4-{2-(3,4-Bisdifluromethoxyphenyl)-2-{4-(1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-phenyl]-ethyl}-3-methylpyridine-1-oxide], a Potent and Selective Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2004; 310(2): 752 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||