MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dym, O.
Right arrow Articles by Colicelli, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dym, O.
Right arrow Articles by Colicelli, J.

Vol. 61, Issue 1, 20-25, January 2002

Molecular Docking of Competitive Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors

Orly Dym, Ioannis Xenarios, Hengming Ke, and John Colicelli

University of California Los Angeles-Department of Energy Laboratory of Structural Biology and Molecular Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (O.D., I.X.); Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (H.K.); and Department of Biological Chemistry and the Molecular Biology Institute, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California (J.C.)

Mammalian phosphodiesterases types 3 and 4 (PDE3 and PDE4) hydrolyze cAMP and are essential for the regulation of this intracellular second messenger. These enzymes share structural and biochemical similarities, but each can be distinguished by its sensitivity to isoenzyme-specific, substrate-competitive inhibitors. We present a model configuration for the PDE4 substrate (cAMP) and a PDE4-specific inhibitor (rolipram) within the active site of the enzyme. The docked models were also used to examine the structural consequences of mutations that confer resistance to rolipram and other PDE4-specific inhibitors. The proposed rolipram-binding configuration is consistent with the substrate-competitive nature of inhibition and also provides a structural basis for the observed specificity of binding to the R- versus S-enantiomer. For mutations that render the enzyme rolipram-insensitive, there was generally an inverse relationship between the magnitude of the drug resistance and the distance of the altered residue from the predicted binding site. We observed a direct correlation between the net loss of protein residue interactions (van der Waals contacts and hydrogen bond interactions) and the degree of rolipram resistance. The positions of several drug sensitivity-determinant residues define a surface leading to the substrate- and drug-binding sites, suggesting a possible approach channel leading to the enzyme active site. The binding of other PDE4 inhibitors (high- and low-affinity) was also modeled and used to predict the involvement of residues that were not previously implicated in pharmacological interactions.


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Navakkode, S. Sajikumar, and J. U. Frey
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Mediated Reinforcement of Hippocampal Early Long-Term Depression by the Type IV-Specific Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor Rolipram and Its Effect on Synaptic Tagging
J. Neurosci., November 16, 2005; 25(46): 10664 - 10670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
D. Claveau, S. L. Chen, S. O'Keefe, D. M. Zaller, A. Styhler, S. Liu, Z. Huang, D. W. Nicholson, and J. A. Mancini
Preferential Inhibition of T Helper 1, but Not T Helper 2, Cytokines in Vitro by L-826,141 [4-{2-(3,4-Bisdifluromethoxyphenyl)-2-{4-(1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-phenyl]-ethyl}-3-methylpyridine-1-oxide], a Potent and Selective Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitor
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2004; 310(2): 752 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics