MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, T.
Right arrow Articles by Heinemann, S. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, T.
Right arrow Articles by Heinemann, S. F.

Vol. 61, Issue 2, 326-333, February 2002

NMDA Receptors Formed by NR1 in Xenopus laevis Oocytes Do Not Contain the Endogenous Subunit XenU1

Tim Green, Cheryl A. Rogers, Anis Contractor, and Stephen F. Heinemann

Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California

Activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate-selective ionotropic glutamate receptors (NMDA receptors) requires two agonists, glutamate and glycine. These ligands are thought to bind to the NR2 and NR1 subunits, respectively, apparently ruling out the formation of functional homomeric receptors. However, NMDA-mediated currents are observed when the mammalian NR1 subunit is expressed alone in Xenopus laevis oocytes. These currents have been generally ascribed to a functional association between NR1 and the endogenous glutamate receptor subunit XenU1. To determine whether such a functional association does in fact occur, we have isolated cDNAs for both XenU1 and XenU1a, a presumed nonallelic counterpart. We investigated whether the coexpression of either XenU1 or XenU1a with NR1 in either X. laevis oocytes and human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells had any effect on the observed NMDA receptor responses. In oocytes, coinjection of XenU1 with NR1 did not increase the observed currents compared with injection of NR1 alone; similarly, in HEK 293 cells, coexpression of XenU1 and NR1 did not result in the formation of functional channels. We also found no pharmacological or biochemical evidence for interaction between the two subunits. We conclude, therefore, that XenU1 does not associate with the NR1 subunit and that an alternative explanation must be sought for the channels observed when NR1 is expressed alone in oocytes.


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. Zhang, N. Nayeem, M. H. Nanao, and T. Green
Interface Interactions Modulating Desensitization of the Kainate-Selective Ionotropic Glutamate Receptor Subunit GluR6
J. Neurosci., September 27, 2006; 26(39): 10033 - 10042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
C. Schmidt, M. Werner, and M. Hollmann
Revisiting the Postulated "Unitary Glutamate Receptor": Electrophysiological and Pharmacological Analysis in Two Heterologous Expression Systems Fails to Detect Evidence for Its Existence
Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2006; 69(1): 119 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics