![]() |
|
|
Vol. 61, Issue 5, 1202-1210, May 2002
Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Dartmouth Medical School,
Hanover, New Hampshire (J.S., K.A.M., J.H.); and Department of Surgery,
Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire (K.A.M.)
The human prostacyclin receptor (hIP), a G protein-coupled receptor
(GPCR), plays important roles in vascular smooth muscle relaxation as
well as the prevention of platelet aggregation. It has been postulated
that GPCR transmembrane (TM) prolines serve as molecular hinges or
swivels and are necessary for proper binding and activation. By
individually (as well as collectively) mutating these hIP prolines to
alanine, the ability to form key structural and functional
configurations was removed. Significant effects on both binding and
activation were observed. Two highly conserved prolines across GPCRs,
Pro-154, and Pro-254 (TMVI), showed the greatest effect on
decreasing both binding and activation when changed to alanine. Along
the extracellular boundary of the highly conserved transmembrane III
domain, a proline-to-alanine mutation at position 89 (P89A) revealed
normal binding affinity in comparison with the 1D4-epitope-tagged hIP
(hIP1D4) wild-type control (Ki, iloprost = 3 ± 2 versus 7 ± 3 nM, respectively). In
contrast, activation was markedly affected, with an EC50 of
12.0 ± 2.5 nM compared with that of 1.2 ± 0.3 nM (10-fold
difference) for the hIP1D4. Movement within TMIII has been shown to be
necessary for effective GPCR activation. Both the extracellular
location (above the putative binding pocket) along with an exclusive
effect upon activation suggest that this movement is facilitated by the
presence of Pro-89 and independent from the actions of ligand binding. This finding strongly supports a model in which proline residues serve
as molecular hinges or swivels, essential for coupling receptor binding
to activation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Arehart, J. Stitham, F. W. Asselbergs, K. Douville, T. MacKenzie, K. M. Fetalvero, S. Gleim, Z. Kasza, Y. Rao, L. Martel, et al. Acceleration of Cardiovascular Disease by a Dysfunctional Prostacyclin Receptor Mutation: Potential Implications for Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition Circ. Res., April 25, 2008; 102(8): 986 - 993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Stitham, S. R. Gleim, K. Douville, E. Arehart, and J. Hwa Versatility and Differential Roles of Cysteine Residues in Human Prostacyclin Receptor Structure and Function J. Biol. Chem., December 1, 2006; 281(48): 37227 - 37236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Muramatsu and M. Suwa Statistical analysis and prediction of functional residues effective for GPCR-G-protein coupling selectivity Protein Eng. Des. Sel., June 1, 2006; 19(6): 277 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Li, H. Choe, A. F. Wang, K. Maiti, C. Wang, A. Salam, S. Y. Chun, W.-K. Lee, K. Kim, H. B. Kwon, et al. Extracellular Loop 3 (EL3) and EL3-Proximal Transmembrane Helix 7 of the Mammalian Type I and Type II Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Receptors Determine Differential Ligand Selectivity to GnRH-I and GnRH-II Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2005; 67(4): 1099 - 1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Conner, D. L. Hay, J. Simms, S. G. Howitt, M. Schindler, D. M. Smith, M. Wheatley, and D. R. Poyner A Key Role for Transmembrane Prolines in Calcitonin Receptor-Like Receptor Agonist Binding and Signalling: Implications for Family B G-Protein-Coupled Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2005; 67(1): 20 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Knox, E. Salcedo, K. Mathiesz, J. Schaefer, W.-H. Chou, L. V. Chadwell, W. C. Smith, S. G. Britt, and R. B. Barlow Heterologous Expression of Limulus Rhodopsin J. Biol. Chem., October 17, 2003; 278(42): 40493 - 40502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Stitham, A. Stojanovic, B. L. Merenick, K. A. O'Hara, and J. Hwa The Unique Ligand-binding Pocket for the Human Prostacyclin Receptor. SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS AND MOLECULAR MODELING J. Biol. Chem., January 31, 2003; 278(6): 4250 - 4257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||