![]() |
|
|
Vol. 62, Issue 6, 1274-1287, December 2002
Department of Chemistry, Kennesaw State University,
Kennesaw, Georgia (D.P.H., D.L.L., J.B.-N., P.H.R.); RTI International,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (S.M.H., H.H.S.); Pharmacology
and Toxicology Department, University of Louisville, Louisville,
Kentucky (M.Z., Z.-H.S.); and Pharmacology and Toxicology Department,
Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia (J.N., D.L.)
In superior cervical ganglion neurons,
N-(piperidiny-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716A) competitively antagonizes the Ca2+ current
effect of the cannabinoid (CB) agonist
(R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone (WIN55212-2), and behaves as an inverse agonist by producing opposite current effects when applied alone. In contrast, in neurons expressing CB1 with a K
A mutation at residue 3.28(192) (i.e., K3.28A),
SR141716A competitively antagonizes the effects of WIN55212-2, but
behaves as a neutral antagonist by producing no current effects itself. Receptor modeling studies suggested that in the CB1 inactive (R) state,
SR1417A16A stabilizes transmembrane helix 6 in its inactive conformation via aromatic stacking with F3.36/W6.48. In this binding site, SR141716A would exhibit higher affinity for CB1 R due to a
hydrogen bond between the SR141716A C3 substituent and K3.28(192), a
residue available to SR141716A only in R. To test this hypothesis, a
"mutant thermodynamic cycle" was constructed that combined the evaluation of SR141716A affinity at WT CB1 and K3.28A with an evaluation of the wild-type CB1 and K3.28A affinities of an SR141716A analog,
5-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-[(E)-2-cyclohexylethenyl]-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole (VCHSR), that lacks hydrogen bonding potential at C3. Binding affinities suggested that K3.28 is involved in a strong
interaction with SR141716A in WT CB1, but does not interact with VCHSR.
Thermodynamic cycle calculations indicated that a direct interaction
occurs between the C3 substituent of SR141716A and K3.28 in WT CB1.
Consistent with these results, VCHSR acted as a neutral antagonist at
WT CB1. These results support the hypothesis that hydrogen bonding of
the SR141716A C3 substituent with K3.28 is responsible for its higher
affinity for the inactive R state, leading to its inverse agonism.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Niehaus, Y. Liu, K. T. Wallis, M. Egertova, S. G. Bhartur, S. Mukhopadhyay, S. Shi, H. He, D. E. Selley, A. C. Howlett, et al. CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Activity Is Modulated by the Cannabinoid Receptor Interacting Protein CRIP 1a Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2007; 72(6): 1557 - 1566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kapur, D. P. Hurst, D. Fleischer, R. Whitnell, G. A. Thakur, A. Makriyannis, P. H. Reggio, and M. E. Abood Mutation Studies of Ser7.39 and Ser2.60 in the Human CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor: Evidence for a Serine-Induced Bend in CB1 Transmembrane Helix 7 Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2007; 71(6): 1512 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Chen, A. Neu, A. L. Howard, C. Foldy, J. Echegoyen, L. Hilgenberg, M. Smith, K. Mackie, and I. Soltesz Prevention of Plasticity of Endocannabinoid Signaling Inhibits Persistent Limbic Hyperexcitability Caused by Developmental Seizures J. Neurosci., January 3, 2007; 27(1): 46 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sarnataro, S. Pisanti, A. Santoro, P. Gazzerro, A. M. Malfitano, C. Laezza, and M. Bifulco The Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor Antagonist Rimonabant (SR141716) Inhibits Human Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation through a Lipid Raft-Mediated Mechanism Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2006; 70(4): 1298 - 1306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Picone, A. D. Khanolkar, W. Xu, L. A. Ayotte, G. A. Thakur, D. P. Hurst, M. E. Abood, P. H. Reggio, D. J. Fournier, and A. Makriyannis (-)-7'-Isothiocyanato-11-hydroxy-1',1'-dimethylheptylhexahydrocannabinol (AM841), a High-Affinity Electrophilic Ligand, Interacts Covalently with a Cysteine in Helix Six and Activates the CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2005; 68(6): 1623 - 1635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Zhang, D. P. Hurst, J. Barnett-Norris, P. H. Reggio, and Z.-H. Song Cysteine 2.59(89) in the Second Transmembrane Domain of Human CB2 Receptor Is Accessible within the Ligand Binding Crevice: Evidence for Possible CB2 Deviation from a Rhodopsin Template Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2005; 68(1): 69 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. McAllister, D. P. Hurst, J. Barnett-Norris, D. Lynch, P. H. Reggio, and M. E. Abood Structural Mimicry in Class A G Protein-coupled Receptor Rotamer Toggle Switches: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE F3.36(201)/W6.48(357) INTERACTION IN CANNABINOID CB1 RECEPTOR ACTIVATION J. Biol. Chem., November 12, 2004; 279(46): 48024 - 48037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||