MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Egebjerg, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Egebjerg, J.

Vol. 63, Issue 1, 19-25, January 2003

The Selective Activation of the Glutamate Receptor GluR5 by ATPA Is Controlled by Serine 741

Mai Marie Nielsen, Tommy Liljefors, Povl Krogsgaard-Larsen, and Jan Egebjerg

Department of Molecular Biology, University of Aarhus, Århus, Denmark (M.M.N., J.E.); NeuroScience PharmaBiotec Center, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Royal Danish School of Pharmacy, Copenhagen, Denmark (T.L., P.K.-L.); and Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark (J.E.)

Only a few agonists exhibit selectivity between the AMPA and the kainate subtypes of the glutamate receptor. The most commonly used kainate receptor preferring agonist, (S)-2-amino-3-(5-tert-butyl-3-hydroxy-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid [(S)-ATPA], is an (R,S)-2-amino-3-(5-methyl-3-hydroxy-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid (AMPA) derivative in which the methyl group at the 5-position of the isoxazole ring has been replaced by a tert-butyl group. When characterized by the two-electrode voltage clamp method in Xenopus laevis oocytes, ATPA exhibits at least 50-fold higher potency on the kainate receptor subtype, GluR5, compared with the AMPA receptors. Through mutagenesis studies of GluR5 and the AMPA receptor subtype, GluR1, we demonstrate that this pronounced selectivity for ATPA can be ascribed to Ser741 in GluR5 and Met722 in GluR1. Examination of other aliphatic substitutions at the 5-position of the isoxazole ring revealed that (R,S)-2-amino-3-(5-isopropyl-3-hydroxy-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid (isopropyl-AMPA) displayed a 6-fold higher potency for GluR5 than for GluR1, whereas the analogs, propyl-AMPA and isobutyl-AMPA, did not exhibit significantly different potencies. Our study suggests that the GluR5 selectivity was a result not only of steric interference between the bulky tert-butyl group in ATPA and the methionine (Met722) in GluR1 but also a serine-dependent stabilization of the active conformation of GluR5 induced by ATPA. The stabilization was agonist-dependent and observed only for ATPA and isopropyl-AMPA, not for other AMPA analogs with bulky substitutions at the 5-position of the isoxazole ring.


Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. M. Sanders, O. T. Pentikainen, L. Settimo, U. Pentikainen, M. Shoji, M. Sasaki, R. Sakai, M. S. Johnson, and G. T. Swanson
Determination of Binding Site Residues Responsible for the Subunit Selectivity of Novel Marine-Derived Compounds on Kainate Receptors
Mol. Pharmacol., June 1, 2006; 69(6): 1849 - 1860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. M. Holm, P. Naur, B. Vestergaard, M. T. Geballe, M. Gajhede, J. S. Kastrup, S. F. Traynelis, and J. Egebjerg
A Binding Site Tyrosine Shapes Desensitization Kinetics and Agonist Potency at GluR2: A MUTAGENIC, KINETIC, AND CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC STUDY
J. Biol. Chem., October 21, 2005; 280(42): 35469 - 35476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. M. Holm, M.-L. Lunn, S. F. Traynelis, J. S. Kastrup, and J. Egebjerg
Structural determinants of agonist-specific kinetics at the ionotropic glutamate receptor 2
PNAS, August 23, 2005; 102(34): 12053 - 12058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics