|
|
|
|
Vol. 63, Issue 4, 862-869, April 2003
Trescowthick Research Laboratories, Peter MacCallum Cancer
Institute, Australia (M.A.M., C.C); Department of Biochemistry, La
Trobe University, Victoria, Australia (D.R.P.)
Synergistic cytotoxicity between cisplatin and the nucleoside analog
gemcitabine was observed in a panel of cisplatin-sensitive (2008, A2780) and -resistant (2008/C13*5.25, A2780/CP70) human ovarian cell
lines. Previous studies have suggested a role for DNA repair in the
mechanism of synergy between the two drugs. We therefore further
investigated the hypothesis that the synergistic cytotoxicity between
gemcitabine and cisplatin in these cell lines may be caused by
gemcitabine-mediated inhibition of cisplatin intrastrand adduct (IA)
and interstand cross-link (ICL) repair. The effect of gemcitabine on
the accumulation and repair of cisplatin IA and ICL in each cell line
was then measured directly using gene-specific quantitative polymerase
chain reaction and denaturation/renaturation techniques, respectively.
Pretreatment of 2008 cells with 1 µM gemcitabine for 2 h before
exposure to cisplatin for 7 h enhanced the accumulation of
cisplatin IA and ICL by 50 and 40%, respectively (P < 0.05), above that induced by cisplatin alone.
To investigate the possibility that the increased accumulation of
cisplatin lesions was caused by inhibition of removal of
cisplatin damage, 2008 cells were incubated with 200 µM cisplatin for
5 h in the presence and absence of gemcitabine and then a further
8 h in the absence of cisplatin. Only 57% IA were removed in the
combination treated cells compared with 74% in cisplatin control
cells. Similarly, repair of cisplatin ICL was inhibited in the
gemcitabine-treated cells compared with the cells treated with
cisplatin only (60 versus 72%). These findings demonstrate a direct
inhibitory effect of gemcitabine on the repair of cisplatin IA and ICL
and suggest a mechanistic basis for the cytotoxic synergy between the
two drugs.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. M. Havaleshko, H. Cho, M. Conaway, C. R. Owens, G. Hampton, J. K. Lee, and D. Theodorescu Prediction of drug combination chemosensitivity in human bladder cancer Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2007; 6(2): 578 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Moufarij, D. Sampath, M. J. Keating, and W. Plunkett Fludarabine increases oxaliplatin cytotoxicity in normal and chronic lymphocytic leukemia lymphocytes by suppressing interstrand DNA crosslink removal Blood, December 15, 2006; 108(13): 4187 - 4193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Ko, E. Dito, B. Schillinger, A. P. Venook, E. K. Bergsland, and M. A. Tempero Phase II Study of Fixed Dose Rate Gemcitabine With Cisplatin for Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2006; 24(3): 379 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Herzog Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: How Important Is It to Treat to Disease Progression? Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2004; 10(22): 7439 - 7449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Sabbatini, C. Aghajanian, M. Leitao, E. Venkatraman, S. Anderson, J. Dupont, D. Dizon, C. O'Flaherty, J. Bloss, D. Chi, et al. Intraperitoneal Cisplatin with Intraperitoneal Gemcitabine in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Phase I/II Trial Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2004; 10(9): 2962 - 2967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||