![]() |
|
|
Departments of Pathology and Cancer Center (P.C.S., M.S., T.F., J.L., T.B., L.A.S.), and Biology and Physiology (D.F.C., E.R.P.), University of New Mexico HSC, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia (W.K.L.); Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan (R.R.N.); and Department of Pharmacology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia (W.E.M., J.G.)
G protein-coupled receptors form a ternary complex of ligand, receptor, and G protein heterotrimer (LRG) during signal transduction from the outside to the inside of a cell. Our goal was to develop a homogeneous, small-volume, bead-based approach compatible with high-throughput flow cytometry that would allow evaluation of G protein coupled receptor molecular assemblies. Dextran beads were derivatized to carry chelated nickel to bind hexahistidine-tagged green fluorescent protein (GFP) and hexahistidine-tagged G proteins. Ternary complexes were assembled on these beads using fluorescent ligand with wild-type receptor or a receptor-Gi
2 fusion protein, and with a nonfluorescent ligand and receptor-GFP fusion protein. Streptavidin-coated polystyrene beads used biotinylated anti-FLAG antibodies to bind FLAG-tagged G proteins for ternary complex assembly. Validation was achieved by showing time and concentration dependence of ternary complex formation. Affinity measurements of ligand for receptor on particles, of the ligand-receptor complex for G protein on the particles, and receptor-Gi
2 fusion protein for G
, were consistent with comparable assemblies in detergent suspension. Performance was assessed in applications representing the potential of these assemblies for ternary complex mechanisms. We showed the relationship for a family of ligands between LR and LRG affinity and characterized the affinity of both the wild-type and GFP fusion receptors with G protein. We also showed the potential of kinetic measurements to allow observation of individual steps of GTP-induced ternary complex disassembly and discriminated a fast step caused by RG disassembly compared with the slower step of G

disassembly.
Address correspondence to: Larry A. Sklar, Department of Pathology and Cancer Center, University of New Mexico HSC, Albuquerque, NM 87131. E-mail: lsklar{at}salud.unm.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. L. Roman, J. N. Talbot, R. A. Roof, R. K. Sunahara, J. R. Traynor, and R. R. Neubig Identification of Small-Molecule Inhibitors of RGS4 Using a High-Throughput Flow Cytometry Protein Interaction Assay Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2007; 71(1): 169 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. R. Leifert, A. L. Aloia, O. Bucco, R. V. Glatz, and E. J. McMurchie G-Protein-Coupled Receptors in Drug Discovery: Nanosizing Using Cell-Free Technologies and Molecular Biology Approaches J Biomol Screen, December 1, 2005; 10(8): 765 - 779. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Simons, S. M. Biggs, A. Waller, T. Foutz, D. F. Cimino, Q. Guo, R. R. Neubig, W.-J. Tang, E. R. Prossnitz, and L. A. Sklar Real-time Analysis of Ternary Complex on Particles: DIRECT EVIDENCE FOR PARTIAL AGONISM AT THE AGONIST-RECEPTOR-G PROTEIN COMPLEX ASSEMBLY STEP OF SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION J. Biol. Chem., April 2, 2004; 279(14): 13514 - 13521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||