MolPharm Over 1500 Individual Drug Articles!

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


0026-895X/04/6601-144-152$20.00
Mol Pharmacol 66:144-152, 2004

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blount, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Corbin, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blount, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Corbin, J. D.

Binding of Tritiated Sildenafil, Tadalafil, or Vardenafil to the Phosphodiesterase-5 Catalytic Site Displays Potency, Specificity, Heterogeneity, and cGMP Stimulation

Mitsi A. Blount, Alfreda Beasley, Roya Zoraghi, Konjeti R. Sekhar, Emmanuel P. Bessay, Sharron H. Francis, and Jackie D. Corbin

Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee

Sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil each competitively inhibit cGMP hydrolysis by phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5), thereby fostering cGMP accumulation and relaxation of vascular smooth muscle. Biochemical potencies (affinities) of these compounds for PDE5 determined by IC50, KD (isotherm), KD (dissociation rate), and KD (1/2 EC50), respectively, were the following: sildenafil (3.7 ± 1.4, 4.8 ± 0.80, 3.7 ± 0.29, and 11.7 ± 0.70 nM), tadalafil (1.8 ± 0.40, 2.4 ± 0.60, 1.9 ± 0.37, and 2.7 ± 0.25 nM); and vardenafil (0.091 ± 0.031, 0.38 ± 0.07, 0.27 ± 0.01, and 0.42 ± 0.10 nM). Thus, absolute potency values were similar for each inhibitor, and relative potencies were vardenafil >> tadalafil > sildenafil. Binding of each 3H inhibitor to PDE5 was specific as determined by effects of unlabeled compounds. 3H Inhibitors did not bind to isolated PDE5 regulatory domain. Close correlation of EC50 values using all three 3H inhibitors competing against one another indicated that each occupies the same site on PDE5. Studies of sildenafil and vardenafil analogs demonstrated that higher potency of vardenafil is caused by differences in its double ring. Exchange-dissociation studies revealed two binding components for each inhibitor. Excess unlabeled inhibitor did not significantly affect 3H inhibitor dissociation after infinite dilution, suggesting the absence of subunit-subunit cooperativity. cGMP addition increased binding affinity of [3H]tadalafil or [3H]vardenafil, an effect presumably mediated by cGMP binding to PDE5 allosteric sites, implying that either inhibitor potentiates its own binding to PDE5 in intact cells by elevating cGMP. Without inhibitor present, cGMP accumulation would stimulate cGMP degradation, but with inhibitor present, this negative feedback process would be blocked.


Received January 21, 2004; accepted April 9, 2004

Address correspondence to: Dr. Jackie D. Corbin, 702 Light Hall, Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232-0615. E-mail: jackie.corbin{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. R. Wilkins, J. Wharton, F. Grimminger, and H. A. Ghofrani
Phosphodiesterase inhibitors for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2008; 32(1): 198 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
E. P. Bessay, M. A. Blount, R. Zoraghi, A. Beasley, K. A. Grimes, S. H. Francis, and J. D. Corbin
Phosphorylation Increases Affinity of the Phosphodiesterase-5 Catalytic Site for Tadalafil
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2008; 325(1): 62 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
B. Lubamba, H. Lecourt, J. Lebacq, P. Lebecque, H. De Jonge, P. Wallemacq, and T. Leal
Preclinical Evidence that Sildenafil and Vardenafil Activate Chloride Transport in Cystic Fibrosis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2008; 177(5): 506 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. A. Blount, R. Zoraghi, E. P. Bessay, A. Beasley, S. H. Francis, and J. D. Corbin
Conversion of Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) Catalytic Site to Higher Affinity by PDE5 Inhibitors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2007; 323(2): 730 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. A. Blount, R. Zoraghi, H. Ke, E. P. Bessay, J. D. Corbin, and S. H. Francis
A 46-Amino Acid Segment in Phosphodiesterase-5 GAF-B Domain Provides for High Vardenafil Potency over Sildenafil and Tadalafil and Is Involved in Phosphodiesterase-5 Dimerization
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2006; 70(5): 1822 - 1831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Zoraghi, J. D. Corbin, and S. H. Francis
Phosphodiesterase-5 Gln817 Is Critical for cGMP, Vardenafil, or Sildenafil Affinity: ITS ORIENTATION IMPACTS cGMP BUT NOT cAMP AFFINITY
J. Biol. Chem., March 3, 2006; 281(9): 5553 - 5558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
C. E. Teixeira, F. B. M. Priviero, and R. C. Webb
Differential Effects of the Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Sildenafil, Vardenafil, and Tadalafil in Rat Aorta
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2006; 316(2): 654 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
X. Zhang, Q. Feng, and R. H. Cote
Efficacy and Selectivity of Phosphodiesterase-Targeted Drugs in Inhibiting Photoreceptor Phosphodiesterase (PDE6) in Retinal Photoreceptors
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 3060 - 3066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
T. M. Lincoln
Cyclic GMP and Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor Therapies: What's on the Horizon?
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2004; 66(1): 11 - 13.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics