MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on September 24, 2004; DOI: 10.1124/mol.104.001321


0026-895X/04/6606-1491-1499$20.00
Mol Pharmacol 66:1491-1499, 2004

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.104.001321v1
66/6/1491    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kortagere, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schetz, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kortagere, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schetz, J. A.

Certain 1,4-Disubstituted Aromatic Piperidines and Piperazines with Extreme Selectivity for the Dopamine D4 Receptor Interact with a Common Receptor Microdomain

Sandhya Kortagere, Peter Gmeiner, Harel Weinstein, and John A. Schetz

Department of Physiology & Biophysics, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York (S.K., H.W.); Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Emil Fischer Center, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany (P.G.); Department of Pharmacology & Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas (J.A.S.); and Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi (J.A.S.)

We previously demonstrated that, in the D4 dopamine receptor, the aromatic microdomain that spans the interface of the second and third transmembrane segments influences the high-affinity interactions with the D4-selective ligand L750,667 [3-{[4-(4-iodophenyl) piperazin-1-yl]methyl}-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine] and the D2-selective ligands methylspiperone, aripiprazole, and its congener OPC4392 [7-[3-(4-(2,3-dimethylphenyl) piperazinyl) propoxy] 2-(1H)-quinolinone] (Schetz et al., 2000). Here we tested a variety of 1,4-disubstituted aromatic piperidines/piperazines (1,4-DAPs) with different subtype selectivities and functional properties against a panel of D4 receptor mutations in the aromatic microdomain to ascertain whether these ligands recognize this common site. Mutant D4 receptors were constructed by substituting the nonconserved amino acid(s) from the corresponding locations in the D2 receptor. The D4-L2.60W, D4-F2.61V, and D4-LM3.28-3.29FV substitutions result in alterations of the relative position of members of the aromatic microdomain. From these results and molecular models of the ligand-receptor complexes, we conclude that 9 of the 11 D4-selective 1,4-DAPs, including L750,667, have a common pattern of ligand-receptor recognition that depends upon favorable interactions with the phenylalanine at position 2.61 (D4-F2.61V, 20-96-fold decrease). Like methylspiperone, aripiprazole, and OPC4392, the two D4-selective 1,4-DAPs that are insensitive to the D4-F2.61V mutation are sensitive to aromatics at position 2.60 (D4-L2.60W, 7-20-fold increase), and they all have longer spacer arms that permit their tethered aromatics to adopt alternative orientations in the binding-site crevice. All 11 of the D4-selective 1,4-DAPs were sensitive to the D4-LM3.28-3.29FV mutation (13-494-fold decrease) but not the moderately D2-selective methylspiperone. The inferences suggest that subtype selectivity involves two different modes of interaction with the microdomain for the D4-selective 1,4-DAPs and a third mode for D2-selective 1,4-DAPs.


Received April 7, 2004; accepted September 23, 2004

Address correspondence to: Dr. John A. Schetz, Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76107-2699. E-mail: jschetz{at}hsc.unt.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. S. Ericksen, D. F. Cummings, H. Weinstein, and J. A. Schetz
Ligand Selectivity of D2 Dopamine Receptors Is Modulated by Changes in Local Dynamics Produced by Sodium Binding
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2009; 328(1): 40 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. A. Al-Fulaij, Y. Ren, M. Beinborn, and A. S. Kopin
Identification of Amino Acid Determinants of Dopamine 2 Receptor Synthetic Agonist Function
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2007; 321(1): 298 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
H. Lan, C. J. DuRand, M. M. Teeter, and K. A. Neve
Structural Determinants of Pharmacological Specificity Between D1 and D2 Dopamine Receptors
Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2006; 69(1): 185 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics