|
|
|
|
Departments of Neurobiology, Pharmacology, and Physiology (M.M.M.) and Medicine (D.A.H.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Mibefradil is a T-type Ca2+ channel antagonist with reported cross-reactivity with other classes of ion channels, including K+, Cl-, and Na+ channels. Using whole-cell voltage clamp, we examined mibefradil block of four Na+ channel isoforms expressed in human embryonic kidney cells: Nav1.5 (cardiac), Nav1.4 (skeletal muscle), Nav1.2 (brain), and Nav1.7 (peripheral nerve). Mibefradil blocked Nav1.5 in a use/frequency-dependent manner, indicating preferential binding to states visited during depolarization. Mibefradil blocked currents of all Na+ channel isoforms with similar affinity and a dependence on holding potential, and drug off-rate was slowed at depolarized potentials (koff was 0.024/s at -130 mV and 0.007/s at -100 mV for Nav1.5). We further probed the interaction of mibefradil with inactivated Nav1.5 channels. Neither the degree nor the time course of block was dependent on the stimulus duration, which dramatically changed the residency time of channels in the fast-inactivated state. In addition, inhibiting the binding of the fast inactivation lid (Nav1.5 ICM + MTSET) did not alter mibefradil block, confirming that the drug does not preferentially interact with the fast-inactivated state. We also tested whether mibefradil interacted with slow-inactivated state(s). When selectively applied to channels after inducing slow inactivation with a 60-s pulse to -10 mV, mibefradil (1 µM) produced 45% fractional block in Nav1.5 and greater block (88%) in an isoform (Nav1.4) that slow-inactivates more completely. Our results suggest that mibefradil blocks Na+ channels in a state-dependent manner that does not depend on fast inactivation but probably involves interaction with one or more slow-inactivated state(s).
Address correspondence to: Dorothy A. Hanck, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 6094, Chicago, IL 60637. E-mail: dhanck{at}uchicago.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H.-L. Zhu, M. Aishima, H. Morinaga, R. D. Wassall, A. Shibata, K. Iwasa, M. Nomura, M. Nagao, K. Sueishi, T. C. Cunnane, et al. Molecular and Biophysical Properties of Voltage-Gated Na+ Channels in Murine Vas Deferens Biophys. J., April 15, 2008; 94(8): 3340 - 3351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Morris and P. F. Juranka Nav Channel Mechanosensitivity: Activation and Inactivation Accelerate Reversibly with Stretch Biophys. J., August 1, 2007; 93(3): 822 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Panyi and C. Deutsch Probing the Cavity of the Slow Inactivated Conformation of Shaker Potassium Channels J. Gen. Physiol., April 30, 2007; 129(5): 403 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Coste, M. Crest, and P. Delmas Pharmacological Dissection and Distribution of NaN/Nav1.9, T-type Ca2+ Currents, and Mechanically Activated Cation Currents in Different Populations of DRG Neurons J. Gen. Physiol., January 1, 2007; 129(1): 57 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. McNulty, J. W. Kyle, G. M. Lipkind, and D. A. Hanck An Inner Pore Residue (Asn406) in the Nav1.5 Channel Controls Slow Inactivation and Enhances Mibefradil Block to T-Type Ca2+ Channel Levels Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2006; 70(5): 1514 - 1523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Maertens, E. Cuypers, M. Amininasab, A. Jalali, H. Vatanpour, and J. Tytgat Potent Modulation of the Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Nav1.7 by OD1, a Toxin from the Scorpion Odonthobuthus doriae Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2006; 70(1): 405 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Strege, C. E. Bernard, Y. Ou, S. J. Gibbons, and G. Farrugia Effect of mibefradil on sodium and calcium currents Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): G249 - G253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Nikonenko, M. Bancila, A. Bloc, D. Muller, and P. Bijlenga Inhibition of T-Type Calcium Channels Protects Neurons from Delayed Ischemia-Induced Damage Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2005; 68(1): 84 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||