MolPharm

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on October 20, 2004; DOI: 10.1124/mol.104.003665


0026-895X/05/6701-123-131$20.00
Mol Pharmacol 67:123-131, 2005

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.104.003665v1
67/1/123    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pennington, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Prince, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pennington, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Prince, R. J.

Structural Basis for Epibatidine Selectivity at Desensitized Nicotinic Receptors

Richard A. Pennington, Fan Gao, Steven M. Sine, and Richard J. Prince

School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (R.A.P., R.J.P.); and Receptor Biology Laboratory, Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota (F.G., S.M.S.)

The agonist binding sites of the fetal muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor are formed at the interfaces of {alpha}-subunits and neighboring {gamma}- and {delta}-subunits. When the receptor is in the nonconducting desensitized state, the {alpha}-{gamma} site binds the agonist epibatidine 200-fold more tightly than does the {alpha}-{delta} site. To determine the structural basis for this selectivity, we constructed {gamma}/{delta}-subunit chimeras, coexpressed them with complementary wild-type subunits in HEK 293 cells, and determined epibatidine affinity of the resulting complexes. The results reveal three determinants of epibatidine selectivity: {gamma}104–117/{delta}106–{delta}119, {gamma}164–171/{delta}166–177, and {gamma}Pro190/{delta}Ala196. Point mutations reveal that three sequence differences within the {gamma}104–117/{delta}106–{delta}119 region are determinants of epibatidine selectivity: {gamma}Lys104/{delta}Tyr106, {gamma}Ser111/{delta}Tyr113, and {gamma}Tyr117/{delta}Tyr119. In the {delta}-subunit, simultaneous mutation of these residues to their {gamma} equivalent produces high affinity, {gamma}-like epibatidine binding. However, converting {gamma} to {delta} affinity requires replacement of the {gamma}104–117 segment with {delta} sequence, suggesting interplay of residues in this region. The structural basis for epibatidine selectivity is explained by computational docking of epibatidine to a homology model of the {alpha}-{gamma} binding site.


Received June 7, 2004; accepted October 19, 2004

Address correspondence to: Dr. Richard J. Prince, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, G38 Stopford Bldg., Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom. E-mail: richard.prince{at}man.ac.uk







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics