QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: mol.104.010520v1 68/2/393    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mathiesen, J. M. Articles by Kostenis, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mathiesen, J. M. Articles by Kostenis, E.

Identification of Indole Derivatives Exclusively Interfering with a G Protein-Independent Signaling Pathway of the Prostaglandin D2 Receptor CRTH2

7TM Pharma A/S, Hoersholm, Denmark (J.M.M., T.U., L.M., L.O.G., E.K.); and Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria (A.H.)

The anti-inflammatory drugs indomethacin and ramatroban, the latter showing clinical efficacy in treating allergic asthma, have been shown to act as a classic agonist and antagonist, respectively, of the G protein-coupled chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTH2 receptor). Here, we report the identification of two indole derivatives 1-(4-ethoxyphenyl)-5-methoxy-2-methylindole-3-carboxylic acid and N-tosyltryptophan (hereafter referred to as 1 and 2, respectively), which are structurally related to indomethacin and ramatroban but which selectively interfere with a specific G protein-independent signaling pathway of CRTH2. In whole-cell saturation-binding assays, 1 and 2 both increase the number of [³H]prostaglandin D2 (PGD2)-recognizing CRTH2 sites and the affinity of PGD2 for CRTH2. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays show that they do not alter the total number of CRTH2 receptors on the cell surface. Analysis of their binding mode indicates that unlike indomethacin or ramatroban, 1 and 2 can occupy CRTH2 simultaneously with PGD2. On a functional level, however, 1 and 2 do not interfere with PGD2-mediated activation of heterotrimeric G proteins by CRTH2. In contrast, both compounds inhibit PGD2-mediated arrestin translocation via a G protein-independent mechanism. In human eosinophils endogenously expressing CRTH2, 1 selectively decreases the efficacy but not the potency of PGD2-induced shape change, unlike ramatroban, which displays competitive antagonistic behavior. These data show for the first time that "antagonists" can cause markedly dissimilar degrees of inhibition for different effector pathways and suggest that it may be possible to develop novel classes of specific signal-inhibiting drugs distinct from conventional antagonists.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Evi Kostenis, 7TM Pharma A/S, Fremtidsvej 3, 2970 Hørsholm, Denmark. E-mail: ek{at}7tm.com

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Kenakin Functional Selectivity through Protean and Biased Agonism: Who Steers the Ship? Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2007; 72(6): 1393 - 1401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Schratl, J. F. Royer, E. Kostenis, T. Ulven, E. M. Sturm, M. Waldhoer, G. Hoefler, R. Schuligoi, I. Th. Lippe, B. A. Peskar, et al. The Role of the Prostaglandin D2 Receptor, DP, in Eosinophil Trafficking J. Immunol., October 1, 2007; 179(7): 4792 - 4799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Mathiesen, A. Christopoulos, T. Ulven, J. F. Royer, M. Campillo, A. Heinemann, L. Pardo, and E. Kostenis On the Mechanism of Interaction of Potent Surmountable and Insurmountable Antagonists with the Prostaglandin D2 Receptor CRTH2 Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2006; 69(4): 1441 - 1453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]