QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: mol.105.016840v1 69/1/119    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schmidt, C. Articles by Hollmann, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schmidt, C. Articles by Hollmann, M.

Revisiting the Postulated "Unitary Glutamate Receptor": Electrophysiological and Pharmacological Analysis in Two Heterologous Expression Systems Fails to Detect Evidence for Its Existence

Department of Biochemistry I-Receptor Biochemistry, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

Several years ago evidence for a so-called "unitary glutamate receptor" was published. This unique type of glutamate receptor was reported to be activated by the traditional agonists of all three major glutamate receptor subfamilies [i.e., -amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate (AMPA), kainate, and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)] in a glycine-dependent as well as magnesium-blockable manner and was reported to consist of an NR1 subunit coexpressed with the kainate binding protein (KBP) from Xenopus laevis, XenU1. To re-examine the existence of such a receptor, we cloned two splice variants of the X. laevis NMDA receptor subunit NR1, XenNR1-4a and XenNR1-4b, and expressed them in X. laevis oocytes as well as in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells, either alone or with the X. laevis KBP subunit XenU1. In addition, we coexpressed XenU1 separately with all eight splice variants of the rat NR1 subunit. In no case did we see evidence of a unitary glutamate receptor pharmacology. In HEK293 cells, we did not get receptor response unless an NR2 subunit was coexpressed. In X. laevis oocytes, we did observe responses to glutamate/glycine as well as small responses to glycine alone, but these were independent of coexpressed XenU1. Neither AMPA nor kainate ever elicited significant responses. Because we verified that XenU1 is expressed and inserted into the plasma membrane of HEK293 cells, we conclude that XenU1 and NR1 do not form the postulated unitary glutamate receptor. Furthermore, successful amplification of a fragment of a X. laevis NR2 subunit indicates that X. laevis uses NR2 subunits and not XenU1 to form heteromeric complexes with NR1.

Address correspondence to: Prof. Dr. M. Hollmann, Department of Biochemistry I-Receptor Biochemistry, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitaetsstrasse 150, Building NC, Level 6, Room 170, D-44789 Bochum, Germany. E-mail: michael.hollmann{at}rub.de

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. M. Schmid, C. Korber, S. Herrmann, M. Werner, and M. Hollmann A Domain Linking the AMPA Receptor Agonist Binding Site to the Ion Pore Controls Gating and Causes lurcher Properties when Mutated J. Neurosci., November 7, 2007; 27(45): 12230 - 12241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Korber, M. Werner, J. Hoffmann, C. Sager, M. Tietze, S. M. Schmid, S. Kott, and M. Hollmann Stargazin Interaction with {alpha}-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole Propionate (AMPA) Receptors Is Critically Dependent on the Amino Acid at the Narrow Constriction of the Ion Channel J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2007; 282(26): 18758 - 18766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]