MolPharm xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward
First published on October 11, 2005; DOI: 10.1124/mol.105.017194


0026-895X/06/6901-299-308$20.00
Mol Pharmacol 69:299-308, 2006

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
mol.105.017194v1
69/1/299    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yeh, S.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Gean, P.-W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yeh, S.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Gean, P.-W.

Synaptic Expression of Glutamate Receptor after Encoding of Fear Memory in the Rat Amygdala

Shiu-Hwa Yeh, Sheng-Chun Mao, Hui-Ching Lin, and Po-Wu Gean

Department of Pharmacology, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

Fear conditioning has been ascribed to presynaptic mechanisms, particularly presynaptic facilitation of transmission at thalamo- and cortico-amygdala synapses. Here, by labeling surface receptors with biotin or using membrane fractionation approaches, we report that fear conditioning resulted in an increase in surface expression of GluR1 subunit of {alpha}-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors in the amygdala, whereas total GluR1 mRNA and protein levels were unchanged. The control group that received conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus in an unpaired fashion did not present any increase, indicating that GluR1 increase was specific to the learning component of the task. Conditioning-induced increase in surface expression of GluR1 depended on the activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and protein kinases and required the synthesis of new proteins. CS-alone trials applied 24 h before training attenuated fear-potentiated startle and prevented conditioning-induced increase in surface expression of GluR1. Increase in GluR1 was also observed in the amygdala slices after delivery of tetanic stimulation that elicited long-term potentiation of synaptic transmission. Proteasome inhibitor increased surface expression of GluR1 in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, pretraining administration of proteasome inhibitor into the amygdala facilitated the fear-potentiated startle. These results suggest that long-term memory formation is correlated with the change in synaptic expression of GluR1, and trafficking of GluR1 to the synaptic sites contributes at least in part to the expression of fear memory.


Received July 22, 2005; accepted October 7, 2005

Address correspondence to: Dr. Po-Wu Gean, Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 701. E-mail: powu{at}mail.ncku.edu.tw




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Kim, S. Lee, K. Park, I. Hong, B. Song, G. Son, H. Park, W. R. Kim, E. Park, H. K. Choe, et al.
Amygdala depotentiation and fear extinction
PNAS, December 26, 2007; 104(52): 20955 - 20960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. K. Lack, M. R. Diaz, A. Chappell, D. W. DuBois, and B. A. McCool
Chronic Ethanol and Withdrawal Differentially Modulate Pre- and Postsynaptic Function at Glutamatergic Synapses in Rat Basolateral Amygdala
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3185 - 3196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. Humeau, D. Reisel, A. W. Johnson, T. Borchardt, V. Jensen, C. Gebhardt, V. Bosch, P. Gass, D. M. Bannerman, M. A. Good, et al.
A Pathway-Specific Function for Different AMPA Receptor Subunits in Amygdala Long-Term Potentiation and Fear Conditioning
J. Neurosci., October 10, 2007; 27(41): 10947 - 10956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Mokin, Z. Zheng, and J. Keifer
Conversion of Silent Synapses Into the Active Pool by Selective GluR1-3 and GluR4 AMPAR Trafficking During In Vitro Classical Conditioning
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1278 - 1286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Shen, L. Korutla, N. Champtiaux, S. Toda, R. LaLumiere, J. Vallone, M. Klugmann, J. A. Blendy, S. A. Mackler, and P. W Kalivas
NAC1 Regulates the Recruitment of the Proteasome Complex into Dendritic Spines
J. Neurosci., August 15, 2007; 27(33): 8903 - 8913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S.-C. Mao, Y.-H. Hsiao, and P.-W. Gean
Extinction Training in Conjunction with a Partial Agonist of the Glycine Site on the NMDA Receptor Erases Memory Trace.
J. Neurosci., August 30, 2006; 26(35): 8892 - 8899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics