![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 6097, Valbonne, France (L.R., S.D., M.L., P.E.); and Laboratory of Toxicology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (F.B., S.Z., J.T.)
Four novel peptide toxins that act on voltage-gated sodium channels have been isolated from tarantula venoms: ceratotoxins 1, 2, and 3 (CcoTx1, CcoTx2, and CcoTx3) from Ceratogyrus cornuatus and phrixotoxin 3 (PaurTx3) from Phrixotrichus auratus. The pharmacological profiles of these new toxins were characterized by electrophysiological measurements on six cloned voltage-gated sodium channel subtypes expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes (Nav1.1/
1, Nav1.2/
1, Nav1.3/
1, Nav1.4/
1, Nav1.5/
1, and Nav1.8/
1). These novel toxins modulate voltage-gated sodium channels with properties similar to those of typical gating-modifier toxins, both by causing a depolarizing shift in gating kinetics and by blocking the inward component of the sodium current. PaurTx3 is one of the most potent peptide modulators of voltage-gated sodium channels described thus far from spider venom, modulating Nav1.2 with an IC50 value of 0.6 ± 0.1 nM. CcoTx1 and CcoTx2, differing by only one amino acid, are potent modulators of different voltage-gated sodium channel subtypes from the central nervous system, except for Nav1.3, which is only affected by CcoTx2. The potency of CcoTx3 is lower, although this toxin seems to be more selective for the tetrodotoxin-resistant channel subtype Nav1.5/
1 (IC50 = 447 ± 32 nM). In addition to these results, molecular modeling indicates that subtle differences in toxin surfaces may relate to their different pharmacological profiles. Furthermore, an evolutionary trace analysis of these toxins and other structurally related three-disulfide spider toxins provides clues for the exploration of toxin-channel interaction and future structure-function research.
Address correspondence to: Jan Tytgat, University of Leuven, Laboratory of Toxicology, Van Evenstraat 4, Leuven 3000, Belgium. E-mail: jan.tytgat{at}pharm.kuleuven.be
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. J. Smith, T. R. Cummins, S. Alphy, and K. M. Blumenthal Molecular Interactions of the Gating Modifier Toxin ProTx-II with Nav1.5: IMPLIED EXISTENCE OF A NOVEL TOXIN BINDING SITE COUPLED TO ACTIVATION J. Biol. Chem., April 27, 2007; 282(17): 12687 - 12697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Cohen, N. Gilles, I. Karbat, N. Ilan, D. Gordon, and M. Gurevitz Direct Evidence That Receptor Site-4 of Sodium Channel Gating Modifiers Is Not Dipped in the Phospholipid Bilayer of Neuronal Membranes J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 2006; 281(30): 20673 - 20679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||