QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: mol.106.026419v1 70/6/2052    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lenkey, N. Articles by Mike, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lenkey, N. Articles by Mike, A.

The Mechanism of Activity-Dependent Sodium Channel Inhibition by the Antidepressants Fluoxetine and Desipramine

Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary

The effect of monoamine uptake inhibitor-type antidepressants on sodium channels of hippocampal neurons was investigated. Members of the tricyclic group of antidepressants are known to modify multiple targets, including sodium channels, whereas selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are regarded as highly selective compounds, and their effect on sodium channels was not investigated in detail. In this study, a representative member of each group was chosen: the tricyclic antidepressant desipramine and the SSRI fluoxetine. The drugs were roughly equipotent use-dependent inhibitors of sodium channels, with IC₅₀ values 100 µMat -150 mV holding potential, and 1 µMat -60 mV. We suggest that therapeutic concentrations of antidepressants affect neuronal information processing partly by direct, activity-dependent inhibition of sodium channels. As for the mechanism of inhibition, use-dependent inhibition by antidepressants was believed to be due to a preferential affinity to the fast-inactivated state. Using a voltage and perfusion protocol by which relative affinities to fast-versus slow-inactivated states could be assessed, we challenged this view and found that the affinity of both drugs to slowinactivated state(s) was higher. We propose a different mechanism of action for these antidepressants, in which slow rather than fast inactivation plays the dominant role. This mechanism is similar but not equivalent with the novel mechanism of usedependent sodium channel inhibition previously described by our group (Neuroscience 125:1019-1028, 2004; Neuroreport 14:1945-1949, 2003). Our results suggest that different drugs can produce use-dependent sodium channel inhibition by different mechanisms.

Received for publication May 8, 2006.

Accepted for publication September 19, 2006.

Address correspondence to: A. Mike, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 67, H-1450 Budapest, Hungary. E-mail: mike{at}koki.hu